Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Jesus accommodated himself to the popular belief in respect at
least to “_Abraham’s bosom_” (_Luke 16:22_), and he confessed
ignorance with regard to the time of the end (_Mark 13:32_); see
Rush Rhees, Life of Jesus of Nazareth, 245-248. But in the former
case his hearers probably understood him to speak figuratively and
rhetorically, while in the latter case there was no teaching of
the false but only limitation of knowledge with regard to the
true. Our Lord did not hesitate to contradict Pharisaic belief in
the efficacy of ceremonies, and Sadducean denial of resurrection
and future life. The doctrine of angels had even stronger hold
upon the popular mind than had these errors of the Pharisees and
Sadducees. That Jesus did not correct or deny the general belief,
but rather himself expressed and confirmed it, implies that the
belief was rational and Scriptural. For one of the best statements
of the argument for the existence of evil spirits, see Broadus,
Com. on _Mat. 8:28_.
_Eph. 3:10_—“_to the intent that now unto the principalities and
the powers in the heavenly places might be made known through the
church the manifold wisdom of God_”—excludes the hypothesis that
angels are simply abstract conceptions of good or evil. We speak
of “moon-struck” people (lunatics), only when we know that nobody
supposes us to believe in the power of the moon to cause madness.
But Christ’s contemporaries _did_ suppose him to believe in
angelic spirits, good and evil. If this belief was an error, it
was by no means a harmless one, and the benevolence as well as the
veracity of Christ would have led him to correct it. So too, if
Paul had known that there were no such beings as angels, he could
not honestly have contented himself with forbidding the Colossians
to worship them (_Col 2:18_) but would have denied their
existence, as he denied the existence of heathen gods (_1 Cor.
8:4_).
Theodore Parker said it was very evident that Jesus Christ
believed in a personal devil. Harnack, Wesen des Christenthums,
35—“There can be no doubt that Jesus shared with his
contemporaries the representation of two kingdoms, the kingdom of
God and the kingdom of the devil.” Wendt, Teaching of Jesus,
1:164—Jesus “makes it appear as if Satan was the immediate
tempter. I am far from thinking that he does so in a merely
figurative way. Beyond all doubt Jesus accepted the contemporary
ideas as to the real existence of Satan, and accordingly, in the
particular cases of disease referred to, he supposes a real
Satanic temptation.” Maurice, Theological Essays, 32, 34—“The
acknowledgment of an evil spirit is characteristic of
Christianity.” H. B. Smith, System, 261—“It would appear that the
power of Satan in the world reached its culminating point at the
time of Christ, and has been less ever since.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account