Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
In corroboration of this general view, note that angels and
cherubim never go together; and that in the closing visions of the
book of Revelation these symbolic forms are seen no longer. When
redeemed humanity has entered heaven, the figures which typified
that humanity, having served their purpose, finally disappear. For
fuller elaboration, see A. H. Strong, The Nature and Purpose of
the Cherubim, in Philosophy and Religion, 391-399; Fairbairn,
Typology, 1:185-208; Elliott, Horæ Apocalypticæ, 1:87; Bib. Sac.,
1876:32-51; Bib. Com., 1:49-52—“The winged lions, eagles, and
bulls, that guard the entrances of the palace of Nineveh, are
worshipers rather than divinities.” It has lately been shown that
the winged bull of Assyria was called “Kerub” almost as far back
as the time of Moses. The word appears in its Hebrew form 500
years before the Jews had any contact with the Persian dominion.
The Jews did not derive it from any Aryan race. It belonged to
their own language.
The variable form of the cherubim seems to prove that they are
symbolic appearances rather than real beings. A parallel may be
found in classical literature. In Horace, Carmina, 3:11, 15,
Cerberus has three heads; in 2:13, 34, he has a hundred. Bréal,
Semantics suggests that the three heads may be dog-heads, while
the hundred heads may be snake-heads. But Cerberus is also
represented in Greece as having only one head. Cerberus must
therefore be a symbol rather than an actually existing creature.
H. W. Congdon of Wyoming, N. Y., held, however, that the cherubim
are symbols of God’s life in the universe as a whole. _Ez.
28:14-19_—“_the anointed cherub that covereth_”—the power of the
King of Tyre was so all-pervading throughout his dominion, his
sovereignty so absolute, and his decrees so instantly obeyed, that
his rule resembled the divine government over the world. Mr.
Congdon regarded the cherubim as a proof of monism. See
Margoliouth, The Lord’s Prayer, 159-180. On animal characteristics
in man, see Hopkins, Scriptural Idea of Man, 105.
3. As to their moral character.
(_a_) They were all created holy.
_Gen. 1:31_—“_God saw everything that he had made, and, behold, it
was very good_”; _Jude 6_—“_angels that kept not their own
beginning_”—ἀρχήν seems here to mean their beginning in holy
character, rather than their original lordship and dominion.
(_b_) They had a probation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account