Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
It shows us that sin is not mere finiteness, to see these finite
intelligences that maintained their integrity. Shakespeare, Henry
VIII, 2:2—“He counsels a divorce—a loss of her That, like a jewel,
has hung twenty years About his neck, yet never lost her lustre;
Of her that loves him with that excellence That angels love good
men with; even of her That, when the greatest stroke of fortune
falls, Will bless the king.” Measure for Measure, 2:2—“Man, proud
man, Plays such fantastic tricks before high heaven, As makes the
angels weep.”
B. Uses of the doctrine of evil angels.
(_a_) It illustrates the real nature of sin, and the depth of the ruin to
which it may bring the soul, to reflect upon the present moral condition
and eternal wretchedness to which these spirits, so highly endowed, have
brought themselves by their rebellion against God.
(_b_) It inspires a salutary fear and hatred of the first subtle
approaches of evil from within or from without, to remember that these may
be the covert advances of a personal and malignant being, who seeks to
overcome our virtue and to involve us in his own apostasy and destruction.
(_c_) It shuts us up to Christ, as the only Being who is able to deliver
us or others from the enemy of all good.
(_d_) It teaches us that our salvation is wholly of grace, since for such
multitudes of rebellious spirits no atonement and no renewal were
provided—simple justice having its way, with no mercy to interpose or
save.
Philippi, in his Glaubenslehre, 3:151-284, suggests the following
relations of the doctrine of Satan to the doctrine of sin: 1.
Since Satan is a fallen _angel_, who once was pure, evil is not
self-existent or necessary. Sin does not belong to the substance
which God created, but is a later addition. 2. Since Satan is a
purely _spiritual_ creature, sin cannot have its origin in mere
sensuousness, or in the mere possession of a physical nature. 3.
Since Satan is not a _weak_ and _poorly endowed_ creature, sin is
not a necessary result of weakness and limitation. 4. Since Satan
is _confirmed in evil_, sin is not necessarily a transient or
remediable act of will. 5. Since in Satan sin _does not come to an
end_, sin is not a step of creaturely development, or a stage of
progress to something higher and better. On the uses of the
doctrine, see also Van Oosterzee, Christian Dogmatics, 1:316;
Robert Hall, Works, 3:35-51; Brooks, Satan and his Devices.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account