Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Evolution does not make the idea of a Creator superfluous, because
evolution is only the method of God. It is perfectly consistent
with a Scriptural doctrine of Creation that man should emerge at
the proper time, governed by different laws from the brute
creation yet growing out of the brute, just as the foundation of a
house built of stone is perfectly consistent with the wooden
structure built upon it. All depends upon the plan. An atheistic
and undesigning evolution cannot include man without excluding
what Christianity regards as essential to man; see Griffith-Jones,
Ascent through Christ, 43-73. But a theistic evolution can
recognize the whole process of man’s creation as equally the work
of nature and the work of God.
Schurman, Agnosticism and Religion, 42—“You are not what you have
come from, but what you have become.” Huxley said of the brutes:
“Whether _from_ them or not, man is assuredly not _of_ them.”
Pfleiderer, Philos. Religion, 1:289—“The religious dignity of man
rests after all upon what he _is_, not upon the mode and manner in
which he has _become_ what he is.” Because he came _from_ a beast,
it does not follow that he _is_ a beast. Nor does the fact that
man’s existence can be traced back to a brute ancestry furnish any
proper reason why the brute should become man. Here is a teleology
which requires a divine Creatorship.
J. M. Bronson: “The theist must accept evolution if he would keep
his argument for the existence of God from the unity of design in
nature. Unless man is an _end_, he is an _anomaly_. The greatest
argument for God is the fact that all animate nature is one vast
and connected unity. Man has developed not _from_ the ape, but
_away from_ the ape. He was never anything but potential man. He
did not, as man, come into being until he became a conscious moral
agent.” This conscious moral nature, which we call personality,
requires a divine Author, because it surpasses all the powers
which can be found in the animal creation. Romanes, Mental
Evolution in Animals, tells us that: 1. Mollusca learn by
experience; 2. Insects and spiders recognize offspring; 3. Fishes
make mental association of objects by their similarity; 4.
Reptiles recognize persons; 5. Hymenoptera, as bees and ants,
communicate ideas; 6. Birds recognize pictorial representations
and understand words; 7. Rodents, as rats and foxes, understand
mechanisms; 8. Monkeys and elephants learn to use tools; 9.
Anthropoid apes and dogs have indefinite morality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account