Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Scripture seems to teach the doctrine that man’s nature is the
creation of God. _Gen. 2:7_—“_Jehovah God formed man of the dust
of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life;
and man became a living soul_”—appears, says Hovey (State of the
Impen. Dead, 14), “to distinguish the vital informing principle of
human nature from its material part, pronouncing the former to be
more directly from God, and more akin to him, than the latter.” So
in _Zech. 12:1_—“_Jehovah, who stretcheth forth the heavens, and
layeth the foundation of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man
within him_”—the soul is recognized as distinct in nature from the
body, and of a dignity and value far beyond those of any material
organism. _Job 32:8_—“_there is a spirit in man, and the breath of
the Almighty giveth them understanding_”; _Eccl. 12:7_—“_the dust
returneth to the earth as it was, and the spirit returneth unto
God who gave it._” A sober view of the similarities and
differences between man and the lower animals may be found in
Lloyd Morgan, Animal Life and Intelligence. See also Martineau,
Types, 2:65, 140, and Study, 1:180; 2:9, 13, 184, 350; Hopkins,
Outline Study of Man, 8:23; Chadbourne, Instinct, 187-211; Porter,
Hum. Intellect, 384, 386, 397; Bascom, Science of Mind, 295-305;
Mansel, Metaphysics, 49, 50; Princeton Rev., Jan. 1881:104-128;
Henslow, in Nature, May 1, 1879:21, 22; Ferrier, Remains, 2:39;
Argyll, Unity of Nature, 117-119; Bib. Sac., 29:275-282; Max
Müller, Lectures on Philos. of Language, no. 1, 2, 3; F. W.
Robertson, Lectures on Genesis, 21; Le Conte, in Princeton Rev.,
May, 1884:238-261; Lindsay, Mind in Lower Animals; Romanes, Mental
Evolution in Animals; Fiske, The Destiny of Man.
(_d_) Comparative physiology, moreover, has, up to the present time, done
nothing to forbid the extension of this doctrine to man’s body. No single
instance has yet been adduced of the transformation of one animal species
into another, either by natural or artificial selection; much less has it
been demonstrated that the body of the brute has ever been developed into
that of man. All evolution implies progress and reinforcement of life, and
is unintelligible except as the immanent God gives new impulses to the
process. Apart from the direct agency of God, the view that man’s physical
system is descended by natural generation from some ancestral simian form
can be regarded only as an irrational hypothesis. Since the soul, then, is
an immediate creation of God, and the forming of man’s body is mentioned
by the Scripture writer in direct connection with this creation of the
spirit, man’s body was in this sense an immediate creation also.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account