Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
As God is not mere nature but originating force, so man is chiefly
will. Every other act of the soul has will as an element. Wundt:
“Jedes Denken ist ein Wollen.” There is no perception, and there
is no thought, without attention, and attention is an act of the
will. Hegelians and absolute idealists like Bradley, (see Mind,
July, 1886), deny that attention is an active function of the
self. They regard it as a necessary consequence of the more
interesting character of preceding ideas. Thus all power to alter
character is denied to the agent. This is an exact reversal of the
facts of consciousness, and it would leave no will in God or man.
T. H. Green says that the self makes the motives by identifying
itself with one solicitation of desire rather than another, but
that the self has no power of alternative choice in thus
identifying itself with one solicitation of desire rather than
another; see Upton, Hibbert Lectures, 310. James Seth, Freedom of
Ethical Postulate: “The only hope of finding a place for real free
will is in another than the Humian, empirical or psychological
account of the moral person or self. Hegel and Green bring will
again under the law of necessity. But personality is ultimate.
Absolute uniformity is entirely unproved. We contend for a power
of free and incalculable initiation in the self, and this it is
necessary to maintain in the interests of morality.” Without will
to attend to pertinent material and to reject the impertinent, we
can have no _science_; without will to select and combine the
elements of imagination, we can have no _art_; without will to
choose between evil and good, we can have no _morality_. Ælfric,
A. D. 900: “The verb ‘to will’ has no imperative, for that the
will must be always free.”
C. Will and permanent states.—(_a_) Though every act of the soul involves
the action of all the faculties, yet in any particular action one faculty
may be more prominent than the others. So we speak of acts of intellect,
of affection, of will. (_b_) This predominant action of any single faculty
produces effects upon the other faculties associated with it. The action
of will gives a direction to the intellect and to the affections, as well
as a permanent bent to the will itself. (_c_) Each faculty, therefore, has
its permanent states as well as its transient acts, and the will may
originate these states. Hence we speak of voluntary affections, and may
with equal propriety speak of voluntary opinions. These permanent
voluntary states we denominate character.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account