Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
This theory is propounded by Comte, in his Positive Philosophy,
English transl., 25, 26, 515-636—“Each branch of our knowledge
passes successively through three different theoretical
conditions: the Theological, or fictitious; the Metaphysical, or
abstract; and the Scientific, or positive.... The first is the
necessary point of departure of the human understanding; and the
third is its fixed and definite state. The second is merely a
state of transition. In the theological state, the human mind,
seeking the essential nature of beings, the first and final
causes, the origin and purpose, of all effects—in short, absolute
knowledge—supposes all phenomena to be produced by the immediate
action of supernatural beings. In the metaphysical state, which is
only a modification of the first, the mind supposes, instead of
supernatural beings, abstract forces, veritable entities, that is,
personified abstractions, inherent in all beings, and capable of
producing all phenomena. What is called the explanation of
phenomena is, in this stage, a mere reference of each to its
proper entity. In the final, the positive state, the mind has
given over the vain search after absolute notions, the origin and
destination of the universe, and the causes of phenomena, and
applies itself to the study of their laws—that is, their
invariable relations of succession and resemblance.... The
theological system arrived at its highest perfection when it
substituted the providential action of a single Being for the
varied operations of numerous divinities. In the last stage of the
metaphysical system, men substituted one great entity, Nature, as
the cause of all phenomena, instead of the multitude of entities
at first supposed. In the same way the ultimate perfection of the
positive system would be to represent all phenomena as particular
aspects of a single general fact—such as Gravitation, for
instance.”
This assumed law of progress, however, is contradicted by the following
facts:
(_a_) Not only did the monotheism of the Hebrews precede the great
polytheistic systems of antiquity, but even these heathen religions are
purer from polytheistic elements, the further back we trace them; so that
the facts point to an original monotheistic basis for them all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account