Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
(_b_) Force implies a will of which it is the direct or indirect
expression. We know of force only through the exercise of our own wills.
Since will is the only cause of which we have direct knowledge, second
causes in nature may be regarded as only secondary, regular, and automatic
workings of the great first Cause.
For modern theories identifying force with divine will, see
Herschel, Popular Lectures on Scientific Subjects, 460; Murphy,
Scientific Bases, 13-15, 29-36, 42-52; Duke of Argyll, Reign of
Law, 121-127; Wallace, Natural Selection, 363-371; Bowen,
Metaphysics and Ethics, 146-162; Martineau, Essays, 1:63, 265, and
Study, 1:244—“Second causes in nature bear the same relation to
the First Cause as the automatic movement of the muscles in
walking bears to the first decision of the will that initiated the
walk.” It is often objected that we cannot thus identify force
with will, because in many cases the effort of our will is
fruitless for the reason that nervous and muscular force is
lacking. But this proves only that force cannot be identified with
human will, not that it cannot be identified with the divine will.
To the divine will no force is lacking; in God will and force are
one.
We therefore adopt the view of Maine de Biran, that causation
pertains only to spirit. Porter, Human Intellect, 582-588, objects
to this view as follows: “This implies, first, that the conception
of a material cause is self-contradictory. But the mind recognizes
in itself spiritual energies that are not voluntary; because we
derive our notion of cause from will, it does not follow that the
causal relation always involves will; it would follow that the
universe, so far as it is not intelligent, is impossible. It
implies, secondly, that there is but one agent in the universe,
and that the phenomena of matter and mind are but manifestations
of one single force—the Creator’s.” We reply to this reasoning by
asserting that no dead thing can act, and that what we call
involuntary spiritual energies are really unconscious or
unremembered activities of the will.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account