Systematic Theology (Volume 3 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 3 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Ruskin: “The first and last and closest trial question to any
living creature is, ‘What do you like?’ Go out into the street and
ask the first man you meet what his taste is, and, if he answers
candidly, you know him, body and soul. What we like determines
what we are, and is the sign of what we are; and to teach taste is
inevitably to form character.” If the taste here spoken of is
moral and spiritual taste, the words of Ruskin are sober truth.
Regeneration is essentially a changing of the fundamental taste of
the soul. But by taste we mean the direction of man’s love, the
bent of his affections, the trend of his will. And to alter that
taste is not to impart a new faculty, or to create a new
substance, but simply to set toward God the affections which
hitherto have been set upon self and sin. We may illustrate by the
engineer who climbs over the cab into a runaway locomotive and who
changes its course, not by adding any new rod or cog to the
machine, but simply by reversing the lever. The engine slows up
and soon moves in an opposite direction to that in which it has
been going. Man needs no new faculty of love; he needs only to
have his love set in a new and holy direction; this is virtually
to give him a new birth, to make him a new creature, to impart to
him a new life. But being born again, created anew, made alive
from the dead, are physical metaphors, to be interpreted not
literally but spiritually.
(_c_) It is objected, indeed, that we know only of mental substance and of
mental acts, and that the new disposition or state just mentioned, since
it is not an act, must be regarded as a new substance, and so lack all
moral quality. But we reply that, besides substance and acts, there are
habits, tendencies, proclivities, some of them native and some of them
acquired. They are voluntary, and have moral character. If we can by
repeated acts originate sinful tendencies, God can surely originate in us
holy tendencies. Such holy tendencies formed a part of the nature of Adam,
as he came from the hand of God. As the result of the Fall, we are born
with tendencies toward evil for which we are responsible. Regeneration is
a restoration of the original tendencies toward God which were lost by the
Fall. Such holy tendencies (tastes, dispositions, affections) are not only
not unmoral—they are the only possible springs of right moral action. Only
in the restoration of them does man become truly free.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account