Systematic Theology (Volume 3 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 3 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
On the general subject of Repentance, see Anderson, Regeneration,
279‐288; Bp. Ossory, Nature and Effects of Faith, 40‐48, 311‐318;
Woods, Works, 3:68‐78; Philippi, Glaubenslehre, 5:1‐10, 208‐246;
Luthardt, Compendium, 3d ed., 206‐208; Hodge, Outlines of
Theology, 375‐381; Alexander, Evidences of Christianity, 47‐60;
Crawford, Atonement, 413‐419.
2. Faith.
Faith is that voluntary change in the mind of the sinner in which he turns
to Christ. Being essentially a change of mind, it involves a change of
view, a change of feeling, and a change of purpose. We may therefore
analyze faith also into three constituents, each succeeding term of which
includes and implies the preceding:
A. An intellectual element (_notitia, credere Deum_),—recognition of the
truth of God’s revelation, or of the objective reality of the salvation
provided by Christ. This includes not only a historical belief in the
facts of the Scripture, but an intellectual belief in the doctrine taught
therein as to man’s sinfulness and dependence upon Christ.
_John 2:23, 24_—“_How when he was in Jerusalem at the passover,
during the feast, many believed on his name, beholding his signs
which he did. But Jesus did not trust himself unto them, for that
he knew all men_”; _cf._ _3:2_—Nicodemus has this external faith:
“_no one can do these signs that thou doest, except God be with
him_.” _James 2:19_—“_Thou believest that God is one; thou doest
well: the demons also believe, and shudder._” Even this historical
faith is not without its fruits. It is the spring of much
philanthropic work. There were no hospitals in ancient Rome. Much
of our modern progress is due to the leavening influence of
Christianity, even in the case of those who have not personally
accepted Christ.
McLaren, S. S. Times, Feb. 22, 1902:107—“Luke does not hesitate to
say, in _Acts 8:13_, that ‘_Simon Magus also himself believed_.’
But he expects us to understand that Simon’s belief was not faith
that saved, but mere credence in the gospel narrative as true
history. It had no ethical or spiritual worth. He was ‘_amazed_,’
as the Samaritans had been at his juggleries. It did not lead to
repentance, or confession, or true trust. He was only ‘_amazed_’
at Philip’s miracles, and there was no salvation in that.” Merely
historical faith, such as Disciples and Ritschlians hold to, lacks
the element of affection, and besides this lacks the present
reality of Christ himself. Faith that does not lay hold of a
present Christ is not saving faith.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account