Systematic Theology (Volume 3 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 3 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Gould, Bib. Theol. N. T., 195—“The supremacy of those books which
contain the words of Jesus himself [_i. e._, the Synoptic Gospels]
is that they incorporate, with the other elements of the religious
life, the regulative will. Here for instance [in John] is the
gospel of the contemplative life, which, ‘_beholding as in a
mirror the glory of the Lord is changed into the same image from
glory to glory, as by the Spirit of the Lord_’ (_2 Cor. 3:18_).
The belief is that, with this beholding, life will take care of
itself. Life will never take care of itself. Among other things,
after the most perfect vision, it has to ask what aspirations,
principles, affections, belong to life, and then to cultivate the
will to embody these things. Here is the common defect of all
religions. They fail to marry religion to the common life. Christ
did not stop short of this final word; but if we leave him for
even the greatest of his disciples, we are in danger of missing
it.” This utterance of Gould is surprising in several ways. It
attributes to John alone the contemplative attitude of mind, which
the quotation given shows to belong also to Paul. It ignores the
constant appeals in John to the will: “_He that hath my
commandments and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me_” (_John
14:21_). It also forgets that “_life_” in John is the whole being,
including intellect, affection, and will, and that to have Christ
for one’s life is absolutely to exclude Antinomianism.
B. The Perfectionist,—which holds that the Christian may, in this life,
become perfectly free from sin. This view was held by John Wesley in
England, and by Mahan and Finney in America.
Finney, Syst. Theol., 500, declares regeneration to be “an
instantaneous change from entire sinfulness to entire holiness.”
The claims of Perfectionists, however, have been modified from
“freedom from all sin,” to “freedom from all known sin,” then to
“entire consecration,” and finally to “Christian assurance.” H. W.
Webb‐Peploe, in S. S. Times, June 25, 1898—“The Keswick teaching
is that no true Christian need wilfully or knowingly sin. Yet this
is not sinless perfection. It is simply according to our faith
that we receive, and faith only draws from God according to our
present possibilities. These are limited by the presence of
indwelling corruption; and, while never needing to sin within the
sphere of the light we possess, there are to the last hour of our
life upon the earth powers of corruption within every man, which
defile his best deeds and give to even his holiest efforts that
‘nature of sin’ of which the 9th Article in the Church of England
Prayerbook speaks so strongly.” Yet it is evident that this
corruption is not regarded as real sin, and is called “nature of
sin” only in some non‐natural sense.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account