Systematic Theology (Volume 3 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 3 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
It is only by a common figure of rhetoric that many churches are
spoken of together in the singular number, in such passages as
_Acts 9:31_. We speak generically of “man,” meaning the whole race
of men; and of “the horse,” meaning all horses. Gibbon, speaking
of the successive tribes that swept down upon the Roman Empire,
uses a noun in the singular number, and describes them as “the
several detachments of that immense army of northern
barbarians,”—yet he does not mean to intimate that these tribes
had any common government. So we may speak of “the American
college” or “the American theological seminary,” but we do not
thereby mean that the colleges or the seminaries are bound
together by any tie of outward organization.
So Paul says that God has set in the church apostles, prophets,
and teachers (_1 Cor. 12:28_), but the word “church” is only a
collective term for the many independent churches. In this same
sense, we may speak of “the Baptist church” of New York, or of
America; but it must be remembered that we use the term without
any such implication of common government as is involved in the
phrases “the Presbyterian church,” or “the Protestant Episcopal
church,” or “the Roman Catholic church”; with us, in this
connection, the term “church” means simply “churches.”
Broadus, in his Com. on Mat., page 359, suggests that the word
ἐκκλησία in _Acts 9:31_, “denotes the original church at
Jerusalem, whose members were by the persecution widely scattered
throughout Judea and Galilee and Samaria, and held meetings
wherever they were, but still belonged to the one original
organization.... When Paul wrote to the Galatians, nearly twenty
years later, these separate meetings had been organized into
distinct churches, and so he speaks (_Gal. 1:22_) in reference to
that same period, of ‘_the churches of Judæa which were in
Christ_.’ ” On the meaning of ἐκκλησία, see Cremer, Lex. N. T.,
329; Trench, Syn. N. T., 1:18; Girdlestone, Syn. O. T., 367;
Curtis, Progress of Baptist Principles, 301; Dexter,
Congregationalism, 25; Dagg, Church Order, 100‐120; Robinson, N.
T. Lex., _sub voce_.
The prevailing usage of the N. T. gives to the term ἐκκλησία the second of
these two significations. It is this local church only which has definite
and temporal existence, and of this alone we henceforth treat. Our
definition of the individual church implies the two following particulars:
A. The church, like the family and the state, is an institution of divine
appointment.
This is plain: (_a_) from its relation to the church universal, as its
concrete embodiment; (_b_) from the fact that its necessity is grounded in
the social and religious nature of man; (_c_) from the Scripture,—as for
example, Christ’s command in Mat. 18:17, and the designation “church of
God,” applied to individual churches (1 Cor. 1:2).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account