Systematic Theology (Volume 3 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 3 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Phillips Brooks speaks of “the fantastic absurdity of apostolic
succession.” And with reason, for in the Episcopal system, bishops
qualified to ordain must be: (1) baptized persons; (2) not
scandalously immoral; (3) not having obtained office by bribery;
(4) must not have been deposed. In view of these qualifications,
Archbishop Whately pronounces the doctrine of apostolic succession
untenable, and declares that “there is no Christian minister
existing now, who can trace up with complete certainty his own
ordination, through perfectly regular steps, to the time of the
apostles.” See Macaulay’s Review of Gladstone on Church and State,
in his Essays, 4:166‐178. There are breaks in the line, and a
chain is only as strong as its weakest part. See Presb. Rev.,
1886:89‐126. Mr. Flanders called Phillips Brooks “an Episcopalian
with leanings toward Christianity.” Bishop Brooks replied that he
could not be angry with “such a dear old moth‐eaten angel.” On
apostolic succession, see C. Anderson Scott, Evangelical Doctrine,
37‐48, 267‐288.
Apostolic succession has been called the pipe‐line conception of
divine grace. To change the figure, it may be compared to the
monopoly of communication with Europe by the submarine cable. But
we are not confined to the pipe‐line or to the cable. There are
wells of salvation in our private grounds, and wireless telegraphy
practicable to every human soul, apart from any control of
corporations.
We see leanings toward the world‐church idea in Pananglican and
Panpresbyterian Councils. Human nature ever tends to substitute
the unity of external organization for the spiritual unity which
belongs to all believers in Christ. There is no necessity for
common government, whether Presbyterian or Episcopal; since
Christ’s truth and Spirit are competent to govern all as easily as
one. It is a remarkable fact, that the Baptist denomination,
without external bonds, has maintained a greater unity in
doctrine, and a closer general conformity to New Testament
standards, than the churches which adopt the principle of
episcopacy, or of provincial organization. With Abp. Whately, we
find the true symbol of Christian unity in “_the tree of life,
bearing twelve manner of __ fruits_” (_Rev. 22:2_). _Cf._ _John
10:16_—γενήσονται μία ποίμνη, εἶς ποιμήν—“_they shall become one
flock, one shepherd_” = not one fold, not external unity, but one
flock in many folds. See Jacob, Eccl. Polity of N. T., 130;
Dexter, Congregationalism, 236; Coleman, Manual on Prelacy and
Ritualism, 128‐264; Albert Barnes, Apostolic Church.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account