Tactics, Volume 1 (of 2). Introduction and Formal Tactics of InfantryBalck, W. (William)
History
Tactics, Volume 1 (of 2). Introduction and Formal Tactics of Infantry
Balck, W. (William)
Military art and science; Tactics
The modern infantry rifle, cal. 6.5 to 8. mm., is a magazine arm
employing steel jacketed, pointed bullets, arranged in clips. The
adoption of automatic rifles is contemplated. In these rifles the
recoil energy is utilized for throwing out empty shells and for placing
a fresh cartridge into the chamber at the same time. The objections
made to the adoption of such a rifle (complexity of the mechanism,
danger of wasting ammunition) are similar to the reasons advanced
against the adoption of breech-loading and magazine rifles. In addition
to the increased rate of fire, the advantage of eliminating the effect
of the recoil on the skirmisher must not be underestimated. Moreover,
the elimination of the recoil makes a further increase in the initial
velocity of the projectile possible.
The effect of infantry fire may be considered from two points of view,
viz.: the effect on the enemy of a single projectile, and the effective
hit in itself.
1. THE EFFECT OF A SINGLE PROJECTILE ON ANIMATE TARGETS.[124]
[124] See _Löbells Militärische Jahresberichte_, 1905, p. 475,
and 1906, p. 412, which contain complete references to military
literature. _Militär-Wochenblatt_, No. 1, 1906.
During the Russo-Japanese war the contending parties used the following
small arms and projectiles:
======+=========+=======+=====+=====================+=========
| Rifle. | Model | Cal.| PROJECTILE. |Initial
| |(year).| |Description. |Weight.|Velocity.
| | | mm. | | g. | m.
------+---------+-------+-----+-------------+-------+---------
Japan |{Arisaka | ’97 | 6.5 |Hardened lead| 10.5 | 715
|{Murata | ’94 | 8.0 |core with | 15.42 | 564
| | | |copper-nickel| |
Russia| ---- | ’91 | 7.62|jacket. | 13.7 | 615
------+---------+-------+-----+-------------+-------+---------
The ballistic qualities of the _Arisaka_ rifle were superior to those
of the Russian arm, but the maiming effect of the two rifles was about
equal. The striking energy of the projectiles was not sufficient in
every case, however, to put a man out of action. The explosive effect
produced by bullets striking interior organs and bones at short ranges
(within 500 m.) was more evident in wounds made by the 8. mm. than by
the _Arisaka_ rifle.[125]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account