Tactics, Volume 1 (of 2). Introduction and Formal Tactics of InfantryBalck, W. (William)
History
Tactics, Volume 1 (of 2). Introduction and Formal Tactics of Infantry
Balck, W. (William)
Military art and science; Tactics
[162] In this connection the following works have been consulted:
_Das Gefechtsmäszige Abteilungsschieszen der Infanterie_, 4th
Edition (1905), by Lieutenant-General ROHNE, and _Schieszlehre
für die Infanterie_, 2nd Edition (1906), by the same author;
also _Militär-Wochenblatt_ No. 46 of 1900. To be sure, absolute
trustworthiness cannot be claimed for the figures given, for the
conditions of firing in action are variable; but, as obtained by
Lieutenant-General Rohne, they serve as an excellent standard of
comparison, and, when their relative value is considered, as a basis
for tactical deductions.
(a) Influence of Training.
Individual skill in marksmanship is of decisive importance when firing
at targets of appropriate size at the short ranges. A good marksman,
firing at will, may (not _must_) expect a hit from each round fired,
at any target within 250 m., at a single kneeling opponent within 350
m., at a kneeling file within 500 m., and at a standing file within
600 m. At ranges beyond this, influences, due to the imperfections of
the rifle, make themselves felt; and these influences grow to such
an extent that the best marksmanship training is unable to eliminate
them. A considerable number of rifles must fire in order to produce
an effect; for, as some of the pieces fire short and others over,
the hits are thus distributed over a greater area. But even here
skill in marksmanship is apparent in that the cone of dispersion of
the excellent shots produces a shot group of small diameter, that of
the poorer shots one of very large diameter. Lieutenant-General Rohne
computed (_Schieszlehre für die Infanterie_, p. 84) that when firing
rifle model ’98 with the appropriate elevation at a target 1 m. high,
the marksmen named in the following table would obtain the number of
hits given at the ranges indicated:
=======+========================================
| NUMBER OF HITS OBTAINED BY
+---------------+------------+-----------
Range.|Excellent shots| Fair shots | Poor shots
| Out of 100 rounds fired.
-------+---------------+------------+-----------
1000 m.| 27. | 17.6 | 8.9
1500 m.| 14.2 | 9.7 | 4.8
-------+---------------+------------+-----------
This ratio changes, however, very seriously to the disadvantage of the
excellent marksmen when the appropriate elevation is not used. The
figure given below, in which the curves of hits are traced, shows that
even poor shots may obtain better results in this case.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account