Tactics, Volume 1 (of 2). Introduction and Formal Tactics of InfantryBalck, W. (William)
History
Tactics, Volume 1 (of 2). Introduction and Formal Tactics of Infantry
Balck, W. (William)
Military art and science; Tactics
From this it follows that when fire direction is in competent hands the
appearance of the enemy on the terrain as at B D will be fully taken
advantage of, while firing on slope like B D¹ should be avoided. Troops
will, however, rarely be in a position from which they can see a target
on the slope B D. The efficacy of the fire will in such a case be more
or less a matter of accident. A body of troops in broad formation will
in this case receive a greater number of hits than a column, since
each meter of front of the crest line receives a certain number of
projectiles. It is otherwise, however, where the slope rises in respect
to the line of sight. A line is more easily missed than a column of
considerable depth on the march.
The following data in regard to the increase (diminution)
of the depth of the beaten zones is taken from the work of
Lieutenant-General ROHNE on _Das gefechtsmäszige Abteilungsschieszen
der Infanterie_, p. 44:
======+===============+================
Range.| Rising Slope. | Falling Slope.
m. | 1° | 2° | 1° | 2°
------+-------+-------+-------+--------
800 | ¹⁄₂ | ¹⁄₃ | ∞ | ∞
1000 | ²⁄₃ | ³⁄₄ | 2 | ∞
1200 | ³⁄₄ | ³⁄₅ | ³⁄₂ | 3
1400 | ⁴⁄₅ | ⁴⁄₆ | ⁴⁄₃ | 2
------+-------+-------+-------+--------
[Illustration]
The above figure, taken from Lieutenant-General ROHNE’S work,
_Schieszlehre für die Infanterie_, p. 128, shows the influence of
the ground on the efficacy of fire when “poor” shots are firing at a
target, 100, 200 m. etc., in rear of which are other targets of the
same dimensions but situated either on level ground, on a 2-degree
rising slope, or a 1-degree falling slope. On a rising slope of 2
degrees the depth of the beaten zone is decreased by half, and on a
downward slope of 1 degree increased by half.
“The knowledge of this influence of the ground is of great
importance to the tactician. For this reason I have selected ‘poor’
shots for the above example because the efficacy of infantry fire in
battle will approximate theirs more nearly than any other. From this
we may deduce that where the ground slopes upward in rear of a firing
line, less distance will suffice to withdraw supports from the fire
directed at the firing line than on level ground; and that, if the
ground in rear of the firing line slopes downward, the distances must
be increased unless the slope is so great or the hostile trajectories
so flat that bullets pass over the crest, forming a ‘defiladed
space,’ into which no projectiles strike.”
On ground rising in respect to the line of sight (_i.e._, on the
slope of heights facing the enemy, or opposite to commanding ground,
the slope facing the plain) columns suffer the greatest losses; on
ground falling in respect to the line of sight (on the reverse slope
of hills and on plateaus) line targets suffer the greatest losses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account