Tactics, Volume 1 (of 2). Introduction and Formal Tactics of InfantryBalck, W. (William)
History
Tactics, Volume 1 (of 2). Introduction and Formal Tactics of Infantry
Balck, W. (William)
Military art and science; Tactics
As a general rule, one mounted officer from every infantry unit,
from the battalion up, reports to the next higher commander for the
purpose of maintaining communication. This officer may detail a
cyclist or trooper to accompany him. He is to be prepared to give all
necessary information in regard to his unit, and to keep in touch
with the general situation in order to inform his immediate superior
in regard to it. He communicates with his own unit either by sending
orderlies with messages, or by carrying the orders of the commander
in person.”
6. COMMUNICATION ON THE BATTLEFIELD.
Cyclists and mounted messengers can be employed on the battlefield
only when the conditions are exceptionally favorable; even intrenched
connecting posts communicating with one another by means of shouts
or signals do not absolutely ensure communication in a protracted
engagement. Heliographs or signal lamps are valuable only during the
approach to the battlefield and in large battles.[249] The same is
true of the field telegraph, by means of which, for example, division
headquarters may be connected with the headquarters of the corps. In
an infantry combat, only the field telephone, wig-wag flags,[250] and
signal flags can be used. The employment of telephone and telegraph
has the advantage of ensuring greater quiet at headquarters, since the
coming and going of messengers is eliminated; on the other hand, the
commander is at once informed of every reverse (which may perhaps be
only temporary) and will not always be able to resist the temptation of
leading subordinate commanders by apron strings. The Japanese made a
very extensive use of the various means of communication, but neglected
to guard against an interruption of their lines of information by
installing signal flag stations. This cannot be dispensed with. In the
Japanese army visual signals[251] were not used, and in the Russian
army they were not adopted until October 4th, 1904. Thus means of
communication did not develop beyond the rudimentary stage in both
armies. According to all previous experience, telephone lines, as
now operated, are practicable in attack only for the purpose of
establishing communication down to brigade headquarters.[252]
[249] See _Taktik_, III, p. 116, et seq.
VON LÖBELL’S _Jahresberichte_ 1906, p. 390: _Employment of
Heliographs and Signal Lamps in Southwest Africa_.
[250] Wig-wag signals have been abolished and Morse signals
prescribed in their stead by Cabinet Orders dated January 16th, 1908.
[251] Sir IAN HAMILTON, _A Staff Officer’s Scrap Book_, I, pp.
173-174, 196, 241 and 323.
[252] The station apparatus furnished by the firm of “Zwietusch” of
Charlottenburg, weighs 5.5 kg. with its battery.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account