Tales of the Long BowChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Tales of the Long Bow
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English fiction -- 20th century; Short stories, English
“What in the world are you talking about?” demanded the Colonel.
“His theory,” said Pierce in a meditative manner, “has got something to
do with moving objects being really stationary, and stationary objects
being really moving. Well, you always talk of me as if I were a moving
object.”
“Heartbreaking object sometimes,” assented the Colonel with cordial
encouragement.
“I mean,” continued Pierce calmly, “that you talk of me as if I were
always motoring too fast or flying too far. And what you say of me is
pretty much what most people say of you. Most sane people think we all
go a jolly lot too far. They think we’re a lot of lunatics out-running
the constable or looping the loop, and always up to some new nonsense.
But when you come to think of it, it’s we who always stay where we
are, and the rest of the world that’s always moving and shifting and
changing.”
“Yes,” said Owen Hood; “I begin to have some dim idea of what you are
talking about.”
“In all our little adventures,” went on the other, “we have all of us
taken up some definite position and stuck to it, however difficult
it might be; that was the whole fun of it. But our critics did not
stick to their own position--not even to their own conventional or
conservative position. In each one of the stories it was they who
were fickle, and we who were fixed. When the Colonel said he would
eat his hat, he did it; when he found it meant wearing a preposterous
hat, he wore it. But his neighbours didn’t even stick to their own
conviction that the hat was preposterous. Fashion is too fluctuating
and sensitive a thing; and before the end, half of them were wondering
whether they oughtn’t to have hats of the same sort. In that affair of
the Thames factory, Hood admired the old landscape and Hunter admired
the old landlords. But Hunter didn’t go on admiring the old landlords;
he deserted to the new landlords as soon as they got the land. His
conservatism was too snobbish to conserve anything. I wanted to import
pigs, and I went on importing pigs, though my methods of smuggling
might land me to a mad-house. But Enoch Oates, the millionaire, didn’t
go on importing pork; he went off at once on some new stunt, first on
the booming of his purses, and afterwards on the admirable stunt of
starting English farms. The business mind isn’t steadfast; even when it
can be turned the right way, it’s too easy to turn. And everything has
been like that, down to the little botheration about the elephant. The
police began to prosecute Mr. White, but they soon dropped it when Hood
showed them that he had some backing. Don’t you see that’s the moral
of the whole thing? The modern world is materialistic, but it isn’t
solid. It isn’t hard or stern or ruthless in pursuit of its purpose, or
all the things that the newspapers and novels say it is; and sometimes
actually praise it for being. Materialism isn’t like stone; it’s like
mud, and liquid mud at that.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account