+————————+——————+——————+————————————————————-+——————+————-+
| | | | Observed Path | | |
| Date |G.M.T.| Mag. +————————-+——————————-+Length|Dura-|
| 1890. | | | From | To | of |tion.|
| | | |R.A. Dec.| R.A. Dec | Path.| |
+————————+——————+——————+————————————————————-+——————+————-+
| | h m| | o o | o o | o | sec.|
|Oct+. 17| 10 37| >1 | 219+61 | 255+65 | 16 | 3·5 |
| 19| 10 35| 1 | 61½+26 | 44½+27½ | 15½ | 0·7 |
| 19| 12 0| ½ ☽ | 326-8 | 319-10 | 7 | 0·5 |
| 25| 17 18| >♃ | 168+34 | 180+24 | 14½ | 0·8 |
| 26| 7 33| ♃ | 329+69 | 243+51 | 42 | 4·0 |
|Nov. 1 | 7 1| >1 | 278+49 | 244+11½ | 46 | 6·0 |
| 1 | 9 17| >1 | 345+11 | 307+1½ | 39 | 4·0 |
| 5 | 10 40| >♀ | 28½-25 | 25½-29½ | 5½ | 0·7 |
| 16 | 11 15| ♃ | 274+77 | 265½+67 | 10 | 1·5 |
+————————+——————+——————+————————————————————-+——————+————-+
+————————+—————————————————————+————————+
| | | |
| Date | Appearance. |Probable|
| 1890. | |Radiant.|
| | | |
+————————+—————————————————————+————————+
| | | o o |
|Oct+. 17| V. slow, B. train. | 204+56.|
| 19| Swift, streak. | Orion. |
| 19| Swift, streak. | Orion. |
| 25 |Swift, streak. | Lynx. |
| 26| Slow. | 32+18. |
|Nov. 1 | Very slow. | 50+15. |
| 1 | Slow. | 50+15. |
| 5 | Swift, strk. 15 sec.| Taurus.|
| 16 | Not very swift. | Auriga.|
+————————+—————————————————————+————————+
The _duration of flight_ is a most important element to estimate
correctly, as it affords data wherewith the real velocity may be
computed, and enables the nature of the orbit in which the meteor is
moving to be definitely assigned. This feature is, however, one of the
most difficult of all to derive with satisfactory precision. In the
case of very slow meteors lasting several seconds, it is easy by means
of a stop-watch, or by other methods, to get the times of flight within
narrow limits of error, but the swifter class of meteors complete their
visible trajectories in the fraction of a second, and are gone before
any effort can be made to gauge their durations, so that a value has to
be attributed which is little better than a mere guess.
Every adopted radiant-point should be based on at least five paths,
unless the conditions are special, and these must show a very definite
centre, and present family resemblances. It is often possible to detect
a good centre from very few paths, when the radiant is low on the
horizon, or when it occupies an isolated position.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account