applied to, for a rule calling upon him, forthwith, to deliver up the documents in question. On this, Mr. Gammon drew up an imposing and admirable affidavit, setting forth all the correspondence; and, as soon as he had been served with the rule _nisi_, he instructed Sir Charles Wolstenholme, (the late Attorney-General,) Mr. Sterling, and Mr. Crystal, to "_show cause_" against it; knowing, of course, quite as well as did counsel, with whom he did not think it necessary to hold a consultation, (for fear they should press him to give up the promissory notes without showing cause,) that there was no earthly chance of successfully resisting the rule.--When he took his seat under Sir Charles, just before that learned person rose to show cause, he touched Mr. Gammon on the shoulder, and very warmly complimented him on the highly honorable and friendly feeling which he had manifested towards the unfortunate Mr. Aubrey; but "feared that the case, as far as the legal merits went, was too plain for argument;--but he had looked with unusual care over the affidavits on which the rule had been obtained, and at the _form_ of the rule itself--and rejoiced to say he felt confident that he should be able to discharge it with costs:"--at which Mr. Gammon turned suddenly pale--with joyous surprise, as Sir Charles imagined--he not knowing Gammon so well as we do!--The reader is now in a position to appreciate the following report of what took place--and (_inter nos_) which said report had been drawn up for the _Morning Growl_, by Mr. Gammon himself. COURT OF KING'S BENCH. Yesterday. (_Sittings in Banco._) _Ex parte_ TITMOUSE. "This was a rule, obtained by Mr. SUBTLE on a previous day of the term, calling upon Mr. Gammon, of the firm of Quirk, Gammon, and Snap, of Saffron Hill, Hatton Garden, to show cause why he should not forthwith deliver up to Mr. Titmouse, M. P. for Yatton, two promissory notes, each for the payment, on demand to that gentleman, of £5,000, with interest, by Charles Aubrey. Sir CHARLES WOLSTENHOLME, Mr. STERLING, and Mr. CRYSTAL, now appeared to show cause--and took a preliminary objection to the form of the rule. After a very long discussion, the Court decided that the rule might be moulded so as to meet the facts of the case, and directed cause to be shown on the merits.