World War, 1914-1918; World War, 1914-1918 -- Influence; World War, 1914-1918 -- Peace
They were there only on sufferance, and with guarantees of good
behaviour. A combined vote of the Liberals and Conservatives could
turn them out at any moment. But they played their cards cleverly, for
a time, not adventuring on any revolutionary policy, not trampling on
any old traditions, wearing Court uniform as though to the manner born,
pleased with their prestige and power, being very polite to everybody,
and keeping their hot-heads quiet by promises of future reward when
their majority would be substantial.
They were certainly lucky in having Ramsay MacDonald as their leader
and Prime Minister. A man of high education, though humble birth, with
a fine dignity and grace of manner, sincere in his ideals, believing
in evolution and not revolution, and with an intimate knowledge of
both foreign affairs and Parliamentary rules, he came as no shock to
the House of Commons, and inspired admiration even among his political
opponents. Unable to do much to remedy the state of economic life
in Great Britain—even to fulfil his promises regarding a remedy for
unemployment—he concentrated all his efforts, wisely as well as
tactfully, on the endeavour to solve the European problem between
France and Germany. He saw at once that it would never be solved as
long as hostility and suspicion embittered the relations of France and
England. The man whom all England had accused as Pro-German wrote the
most charming and conciliatory letters to Poincaré, full of sympathy
and understanding for France. Time worked on his side. Poincaré was
defeated when he went to the country for re-election, and contrary
to nearly all the prophets, his policy was rejected and Herriot,
corresponding to Ramsay MacDonald as a leader of the Left, became
Premier of France.
THE DEFEAT OF POINCARÉ
I was one of the few who had some inkling of the change of view in
France and foretold the peril of Poincaré. In conversation with French
people, and especially the ordinary working folk, I gathered that
Poincaré no longer held their confidence. They had backed him when he
ordered the occupation of the Ruhr, but only because they believed
that he would “deliver the goods.” Now they saw that the “goods” were
not forthcoming, and that, instead of receiving large reparations from
Germany, the franc was dropping, abruptly and perilously. They believed
that M. Poincaré was a little too “rigid,” too much of a lawyer, and
too little of a business man. They were aware of all the hate that was
being built up against them in Germany. They said—many of them—“We are
afraid of the future.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account