Ten Years Among the Mail Bags: Or, Notes from the Diary of a Special Agent of the Post-Office DepartmentHolbrook, James
History
Ten Years Among the Mail Bags: Or, Notes from the Diary of a Special Agent of the Post-Office Department
Holbrook, James
Postal service -- United States
Post Office, New Haven, Conn., Feb. 1, 1855.
Solus!?
Well, that is a fix! What is that name? Is it Jonathan or Wm, B.
Haskell, or Hershel? Who'd he marry? How many sisters did his wife
have? What were their names? Who are their friends and relations
in New Haven? Is the lady here on a visit? Or, like a careful
matron, has she come here to educate her children? Egad, I don't
know! My library is wofully deficient in genealogy, and I shall be
obliged to "give it up." Who can tell me the name of "my wife's
sister?"
Yours truly,
L. A. T----.
The New Haven post master's letter was then sent to Mr. H., with the
annexed note:--
Post Office, New York, Feb. 2, 1855.
Mr. Wm. B. H----.
Dear Sir,
By direction of the post master, I forwarded your letter of
inquiry to the post master at New Haven.
He returns the letter to this office with a request that the name
of your "wife's sister" may be given to him, as he has been unable
to discover it, although possessed of a large library embracing
many works of a genealogical character. The P. M. at New Haven is
inclined to the belief that it will be difficult to find the
letter sent to his office, unless the name of the party addressed
is given to him. In this belief the P. M. at New York joins, and
the two P. M.'s hold concurrent opinions on this subject.
With all due apologies for the seemingly gross ignorance of the
post masters in this matter,
I am very respectfully
Your Obedient Servant,
WM. C----,
Secretary.
CHAPTER XXIII
RESPONSIBILITY OF POST MASTERS.
Cases sometimes occur of the loss of letters apparently by the
carelessness of post masters or their clerks; and in view of such
cases, an important question arises; namely, to what extent a post
master is responsible for the consequences of such carelessness?
The subject is not free from difficulties. In many cases it would be
hard to say what constitutes culpable carelessness.
It is common in country towns for persons to take from the post-office
the mail matter of their neighbors, especially when they live at a
distance from the office, as an act of accommodation to them; and many
letters are thus safely delivered every day.
Now should a valuable letter in this way come into the possession of
some dishonest person, and be retained by him, it would seem severe,
if not unjust, to prosecute the post master for the loss; since in
committing it unawares to improper hands, he did but act in accordance
with ordinary usages, countenanced by the community.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account