France -- History -- Louis XIV, 1643-1715 -- Fiction
Now, D’Artagnan, when he left Calais with his ten scamps, would have
hesitated as little in attacking a Goliath, a Nebuchadnezzar, or a
Holofernes as he would in crossing swords with a recruit or caviling
with a landlady. Then he resembled the sparrow-hawk which, when
fasting, will attack a ram. Hunger is blind. But D’Artagnan
satisfied—D’Artagnan rich—D’Artagnan a conqueror—D’Artagnan proud of so
difficult a triumph—D’Artagnan had too much to lose not to reckon,
figure by figure, with probable misfortune.
His thoughts were employed, therefore, all the way on the road from his
presentation, with one thing, and that was, how he should conciliate a
man like Monk, a man whom Charles himself, kind as he was, conciliated
with difficulty; for, scarcely established, the protected might again
stand in need of the protector, and would, consequently, not refuse
him, such being the case, the petty satisfaction of transporting M.
d’Artagnan, or of confining him in one of the Middlesex prisons, or
drowning him a little on his passage from Dover to Boulogne. Such sorts
of satisfaction kings are accustomed to render to viceroys without
disagreeable consequences.
It would not be at all necessary for the king to be active in that
contrepartie of the play in which Monk should take his revenge. The
part of the king would be confined to simply pardoning the viceroy of
Ireland all he should undertake against D’Artagnan. Nothing more was
necessary to place the conscience of the Duke of Albemarle at rest than
a te absolvo said with a laugh, or the scrawl of “Charles the King,”
traced at the foot of a parchment; and with these two words pronounced,
and these two words written, poor D’Artagnan was forever crushed
beneath the ruins of his imagination.
And then, a thing sufficiently disquieting for a man with such
foresight as our musketeer, he found himself alone; and even the
friendship of Athos could not restore his confidence. Certainly if the
affair had only concerned a free distribution of sword-thrusts, the
musketeer would have counted upon his companion; but in delicate
dealings with a king, when the perhaps of an unlucky chance should
arise in justification of Monk or of Charles of England, D’Artagnan
knew Athos well enough to be sure he would give the best possible
coloring to the loyalty of the survivor, and would content himself with
shedding floods of tears on the tomb of the dead, supposing the dead to
be his friend, and afterwards composing his epitaph in the most pompous
superlatives.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account