Computer security -- Fiction; Didactic fiction; Privacy, Right of -- Fiction; Records -- Access control -- Fiction
"Thank you, Senator Deere, and committee members. I am honored
to have a chance to speak to you here today. As a preface to my
remarks, I think that a brief history of security and privacy
from a government perspective may be in order. One of the reasons
we are here today is due to a succession of events that since the
introduction of the computer have shaped an ad hoc anarchism, a
laissez-faire attitude toward privacy and security. Rather than
a comprehensive national policy, despite the valiant efforts of a
few able Congressmen, the United States of America has allowed
itself to be lulled into technical complacency and indifference.
Therefore, I will, if the committee agrees, provide a brief
chronological record."
"I for one would be most interested," said Senator Deere. "It
appeared that this morning our speakers assumed we were more
knowledgeable that we are. Any clarifications will be most
welcome." The crowd agreed silently. Much of the history was
cloaked in secrecy.
The distinguished Ted Hammacher was an accomplished orator,
utilizing the best that Washington diplomatic-speak could muster.
At 50 years old, his short cropped white hair capped a proper
military bearing even though he had maintained a civilian status
throughout his Pentagon associations. "Thank you madam
chairman." He glanced down at the well organized folder and
turned a page.
"Concerns of privacy can be traced back thousands of years with
perhaps the Egyptian pyramids as the first classic example of a
brute force approach towards privacy. The first recorded at-
tempts at disguising the contents of a written message were in
Roman times when Julius Caesar encoded messages to his generals
in the field. The Romans used a simple substitution cipher where
one letter in the alphabet is used in place of another. The
cryptograms found in the Sunday paper use the same techniques.
Any method by which a the contents of a message is scrambled is
known as encryption."
The CNN producer maintained the sole camera shot and his atten-
tion on Ted Hammacher. He missed Senator Rickfield and his aid
reappear on the dais. Rickfield's eyes penetrated Nancy Deere
who imperceptibly acknowledged his return. "You should not over-
step your bounds," Rickfield leaned over and said to her. "You
have five years to go. Stunts like this will not make your time
any easier."
"Senator," she said to Rickfield as Hammacher spoke. "You are
obviously not familiar with the procedures of Senate panel proto-
col. I was merely trying to assist the progress of the hearings
in your absence, I assure you." Her coolness infuriated Rick-
field.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account