Terrestrial and Celestial Globes Volume 2: Their History and Construction Including a Consideration of their Value as Aids in the Study of Geography and AstronomyStevenson, Edward Luther
History
Terrestrial and Celestial Globes Volume 2: Their History and Construction Including a Consideration of their Value as Aids in the Study of Geography and Astronomy
Stevenson, Edward Luther
Geography -- History; Globes
The celestial globe bears the title, “Globe céleste calculé pour l’an
1700. Sur les observations les plus récents. Par. G. De l’Isle
Géographe,” and is dedicated “À Son Altesse Royale Monseigneur le Duc de
Chartres. Par son très humble et très obéissant Serviteur De l’Isle,”
with the following reference to the privilege “À Paris Chez l’Auteur sur
le Quai de l’Horologe à la Couronne de Diamans. Avec Privilége du Roy
pour 20 ans. 1700.”
While it has not been possible to obtain a detailed description of
Delisle’s globe maps, they are referred to as giving practically the
same information as his plane maps, many of the latter to be found in
our important library collections, and cannot be considered rare.[124]
The several constellations which he has represented on his celestial
globes are those of Ptolemy to which have been added two in the northern
hemisphere and thirteen in the southern, and the year chosen for the
representation of the position of the stars is 1700. In general the
names chosen for the several constellations are French, though a few are
in Latin.
[Illustration: Fig. 118. Terrestrial Globe of Guillaume Delisle, 1700.]
A pair of Delisle’s globes may be found in the Königliches Museum of
Cassel, dated 1709; a pair dated 1700 in the Museo di Strumenti Antichi
of Florence, and a terrestrial globe dated 1700 in the Real Biblioteca
of Madrid (Fig. 118).
Weigel, Castlemaine, Coronelli, and Treffler, as has been noted,
represented a tendency in globe construction in their day which we have
referred to as the ultrapractical. It was impossible that their ideas
should find anything like a general acceptance and approval. A globe
eleven or fifteen feet in diameter, in the better judgment of
astronomers and geographers, could not be counted as possessing superior
scientific value, and globes of such dimensions seem only to have won
the praise of the novelty-loving contemporaries, and the same general
criticism may be passed upon the smaller globes of Castlemaine and
Treffler. Perhaps, however, one may well add that in all this a desire
was expressing itself for improvement in globe construction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account