Text-book of forensic medicine and toxicologyBuchanan, R. J. M. (Robert James McLean)
Science
Text-book of forensic medicine and toxicology
Buchanan, R. J. M. (Robert James McLean)
Medical jurisprudence; Poisons
2. _Absence of a motive for the committal of the deed._--The absence
of an _apparent_ motive is no proof of an unsound mind; the moving
principle may be _“the conscious impulse to the illegal gratification
of a selfish desire_.”
3. _The presence or absence of a well-concerted plan of action is
a diagnostic sign of little value._--Casper remarks that “only in
one case can the examination of the systematic planning of the deed
afford any information, and that is when these plans and preparations
themselves evince the stamp of a confused intellect, and betray the
hazy consciousness, the mental darkness, in which the culprit was
involved.”
4. _A dominant delusion may be so concealed as to be for a time
undiscoverable._--The case of the man who gave no indication of his
madness till he was asked to sign the order for his release, when
he signed _Christ_, is an example how carefully a delusion may be
concealed even during a most careful examination. Questions directed to
this point showed that he laboured under all the errors which such a
delusion might suggest.
5. It may “easily be conceived that insane persons, whose unreason
affects only one train of thought more or less restricted, yet labour
in other respects under disorders of feeling which influence their
conduct and their actions and behaviour without materially affecting
their judgment: and that many of such deranged persons, who often
conduct themselves tolerably well in a lunatic asylum, and while living
among strangers with whom they have no relations, and against whom
they have no prejudices or imaginary reason of complaint; subjected,
besides, to the rules of the house and to an authority that nobody
attempts to dispute; would, nevertheless, if restored to liberty
and residing in the midst of their families, become insupportable,
irritable at the slightest contradiction, abusive, impatient of the
least remark on their conduct, and liable to be provoked by trifles to
the most dangerous acts of violence. If, under such circumstances, a
lunatic should commit any act of injury or serious damage to another,
would it be just to punish him; because it cannot be made apparent that
the action has any reference to, or connection with, the principal
delusion which is known to cloud his judgment, it being apparent that
his moral faculties have undergone a total morbid perversion?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account