Text-book of forensic medicine and toxicologyBuchanan, R. J. M. (Robert James McLean)
Science
Text-book of forensic medicine and toxicology
Buchanan, R. J. M. (Robert James McLean)
Medical jurisprudence; Poisons
=Paying patients who are not dangerous=, for admission to a district
asylum, are under more stringent regulations. A declaration that they
are unable to pay the expenses necessary for support in a licensed
house must be made before a magistrate; further, that there is no
friend who can undertake this; and a statement of the length of time
the patient has resided in the country. A magistrate and clergyman must
certify that they have investigated the case. One medical certificate
must be signed by two practitioners. A guarantee for the payment must
be given, and also to remove the patient when called upon. The sanction
of an inspector of lunatics must be given.
For admission into licensed houses, charitable institutions, and single
care, an order by a relative or connection of the lunatic is required
with two medical certificates, unless urgent, when one is sufficient,
but a second must follow within fourteen days.
LIABILITIES OF PERSONS SIGNING LUNACY CERTIFICATES
A medical practitioner is bound to certify as to the sanity of a
person. If, however, he undertakes to fill up the certificates
necessary for the detention of an alleged lunatic, he becomes
responsible to the authorities for the correctness of the certificates,
and if he make a wilful misstatement of facts he is guilty of a
misdemeanour. The medical practitioner may have an action brought
against him by the lunatic when recovered or discharged. The most
vindictive feelings may be entertained against the medical man. In such
a case, if the medical man proves his “good faith” and the exercise of
“reasonable care” in his examination and certification, he receives the
protection of the Court.
LIABILITIES OF PERSONS RECEIVING INSANE PATIENTS
In the case of Nottidge _v._ Ripley and Nottidge, the Lord Chief Baron
having been understood to intimate an opinion that no person ought
to be so confined unless he is dangerous to himself or others, the
Commissioners pointed out that the scope of the Lunacy Acts is not thus
limited. They said:
“The object of these Acts is not, as your Lordship is aware, so much
to confine lunatics, as to restore to a healthy state of mind such of
them as are curable, and to afford comfort and protection to the rest.
Moreover, the difficulty of ascertaining whether one who is insane be
dangerous or not is exceedingly great, and in some cases can only be
determined after minute observation for a considerable time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account