The conveyance of the virus on the _clothes of attendants_ has been alleged by Friedberger and Fröhner, and considering that it has been noted to pass over intervals of about half a mile without the intervention of any horse, it must have been wafted on the air, or conveyed on the surface of man or non-equine beast. Jensen and Clark allege that the contagium may be conveyed to mares by _coition, for months_ after the stallion has shown all outward signs of recovery. This would be entirely in keeping with the analogous fact in swine plague. _Inoculation._ Experimental inoculations have transmitted the disease with difficulty and uncertainty. Those of Hertwig, Nocard, Arloing, Labat, Friedberger, Trasbot, Pasteur and others came to naught. Even the transfusion of the blood of the sick, proved as harmless as the inoculation of the serous exudate. A probable explanation is found in the extreme diffusibility of the germ of equine influenza, which spreads over a city or county in a few days, attacking practically all equine animals. Inoculation is necessarily made at the time of the prevalence of influenza and at such a time all horses in a wide area are likely to be suffering from the affection. Those that are unaffected and therefore apparently available for experiment, are the immune animals. If they were susceptible the probability is that they would speedily show the disease through infection drawn from another source than the inoculation. If the inoculated animal failed to contract the disease, and yet very shortly afterward became infected by simple exposure, there would be some basis for alleging that inoculation was always inoperative. Dieckerhoff, on the other hand, transmitted the disease to healthy horses by subcutaneous and intravenous inoculation of the blood of the sick, and the same seems to be true of inoculations of the cultures of the cocco-bacillus by Lignieres. _Bacteriology._ Our knowledge of the bacteria of equine influenza is as yet very imperfect and uncertain. Galtier and Violet found streptococci and diplococci in the blood and tissues of cases showing intestinal lesions, and held that they were derived from musty fodder. Injections of infusions of such fodder into the trachea of the horse produced broncho-pneumonia, double pleuro-pneumonia, and at times intestinal or meningeal congestion. But there is no proof that the malady so caused, passed with the certainty and rapidity of equine influenza from horse to horse in the same stable.