_Acquired immunity_ must of course be reckoned with. After a non-fatal attack this is usually to be relied on for several years or even for the rest of the lifetime, yet it varies with the individual animals, and, under the baleful combination of a specially potent germ and strongly conducive accessory causes, it may become worn out in a year. Yet the older horses can always be trusted to show a large measure of this immunity, so that in the absence of extraordinary epizoötics it is mainly the young that suffer, and it is only when a country has had no general invasion for a length of time, or when the germ has acquired an unusual pathogenic potency, or when these two conditions conjoin, that the invasion of the equine population becomes universal, as it virtually was in the United States and Canada in 1872–3. Under other circumstances the germ, temporarily shorn of its power, lingers in city and dealers stables, biding its time until circumstances become more favorable for a new general outbreak. Immunity largely explains the comparative mildness of the last cases in any particular locality. The more susceptible animals are attacked first and most severely, while the partially immune ones, which for a time resist, throw off the disease with greater readiness. The explanation has been sought in a lessening potency of the germ, but though this may hold true of some cases, it manifestly does not apply when slight lingering cases only are left in one locality, and the disease is advancing over the neighboring state with all its original force and vigor. _Incubation._ This appears to vary within certain limits. When during an epizoötic a sick horse is brought into a new locality and stable, other cases usually develope in from one to three days. Trasbot gives examples of one day, Salle, Cadeac and others of two, others claim four, seven and even, exceptionally, fifteen days. One reason for an apparently prolonged incubation may be found in the seclusion of the germs in the alimentary canal, so that they escape only when passed with the fæces. The pathogenic potency of individual germs, and the varying susceptibility of the animals exposed must also be taken into account. _Symptoms._ Equine influenza is liable to show a special predilection for a given set of organs in different epizoötics, so that we find descriptions of the different forms as independent types or even separate diseases: as the _catarrhal form_, _thoracic form_, _abdominal form_, _bilious form_, _nervous form_, _pink eye_, _infectious cellulitis_, and _rheumatic influenza_. These forms may, however, appear in different subjects in the same epizoötic, and when they are not due to complications, may be looked on as a concentration of the morbid processes on one class of organs rather than another.