Text book of veterinary medicine, Volume 4 (of 5)Law, James
Science
Text book of veterinary medicine, Volume 4 (of 5)
Law, James
Veterinary medicine
Notwithstanding these untoward results in other hands, I am still
confident that we have in this a measure of no small value, and worthy
of application in suitable cases. A certain percentage of failures in
immunization are to be looked for. Even cowpox vaccination is not always
protective against itself; I knew one man who was successfully
vaccinated every three years in a comparatively long series. Many
habitually self-limiting diseases relapse in particular individuals.
Even in the case of anthrax excess of glucose in the system, and the
lack of some unknown influence of the spleen are respectively
destructive of immunity. Even after the Pasteurian inoculation a certain
number of inoculated animals are lost, it may be between the first and
second injection, or it may be “two or three months” after the latter
(Galtier). We must also bear in mind that in an infected herd or flock,
there are always a certain number already infected at the time of the
protective inoculation, and as the protective conditions are slowly
established, through the action of the leucocytes, it is unreasonable to
expect that serious illness and death can be obviated in such animals.
In inoculation with the Pasteur lymph, the bacillus is held not to enter
the blood, a position supported by the researches of Bitter, Perroncito,
Wissokovicz, Lubarsch, Metchnikoff, Chamberland and Roux, so that the
resulting immunization must come from the toxins. Add to this that
Chauveau (1885), conferred immunity on a sheep by injecting
intravenously, anthrax blood, defibrinated and sterilized by heat:
Arloing obtained immunity in the sheep by injecting, subcutem, the clear
supernatant liquid from old bouillon cultures of anthrax, from which all
bacilli had been precipitated. Roux and Chamberland obtained the same
result by using the pulp of an anthrax spleen treated with essential oil
of mustard, so as to destroy the life of the bacillus, and then
evaporated in vacuo to remove the essence. Smaller doses proved
effective, than when the splenic pulp had been filtered or sterilized by
heating to 58° C.
The advantages of using sterilized toxins are numerous:—
1st. As the material can be derived from a case of the outbreak in hand,
there is no risk of using the anthrax protective inoculation for black
quarter, hæmorrhagic septicæmia or other disease which is so often
confounded with it.
2d. There is no danger of the sudden enhancing of the potency of a
weakened microbe on account of some condition of the animal inoculated,
as no living microbe is employed.
3d. There is no possibility of planting the anthrax bacillus, on new
soil, as is so liable to take place in using the weakened microbe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account