_Virulent Matters._ In 1813 Gruner and Count Salm demonstrated the virulent properties of the saliva of the rabid dog. This has been many times repeated, though as shown by Pasteur, Raynaud, and others, inoculations with saliva often kill in one or two days by reason of the presence of other infective germs, or suppuration ensues and destroys the rabific virus so that oftentimes not more than one in four develops rabies. Galtier succeeded in inoculating 3 rabbits, 1 dog and 1 sheep with the juice expressed from the salivary glands, and Nocard, Leclainche and Peuch have found this to be very virulent. Paul Bert found the bronchial mucus virulent. Rabies has been frequently conveyed by consuming the bodies of rabid animals, yet Peuch and Galtier have failed to convey infection by the flesh. Eckel and Lafosse successfully inoculated the blood of goat to sheep, of man to dog and of dog to dog. Yet many of the older observers agree with Peuch and Galtier in pronouncing the blood non-virulent. Pasteur, Roux, Bujwid, and Helman failed to obtain virulent cultures from blood. Peuch and Nocard have found the milk virulent, and Bardach found the same to be the case in a woman for two days before her death of rabies. In some partially refractory animals like the sheep, the blood seems to destroy the virus, as intravenous inoculations have been made with impunity. The probability is that the blood is habitually non-virulent in the early stages and in mild cases, but becomes virulent in violent and advanced cases. Pasteur first showed that the virus has a special election for the brain and nervous matter and that the central nervous organs are constantly infecting. Rossi inoculated with a piece of nerve trunk, and Doubouc and Babes advanced the hypothesis that the virus advances along the nerve to reach the brain. It was formerly supposed that the saliva of omnivora and herbivora was non-virulent but repeated experiment has proved it to be infecting. The blunder was due to the fact that these animals did not often transmit the disease by biting. Some writers even deny that rabies exists at all as an infectious disease. One alleges that the danger of rabies is “_less than the gallows_.” Experiment shows most conclusively that it is much more certain when the conditions are fulfilled. One may live a long lifetime without seeing a genuine case of rabies, but so he may without seeing leprosy or plague, and he is no more entitled to doubt their existence than he is the existence of Manila, or of the other side of the moon.