Textile Fabrics: A Descriptive Catalogue of the Collection of Church-vestments, Dresses, Silk Stuffs, Needlework and Tapestries, forming that Section of the MuseumRock, Daniel
History
Textile Fabrics: A Descriptive Catalogue of the Collection of Church-vestments, Dresses, Silk Stuffs, Needlework and Tapestries, forming that Section of the Museum
Rock, Daniel
Art objects -- England -- London -- Catalogs; Textile fabrics
In Scotland, several noble families, whether they spell their name
FRASER or FRAZER, use as a canting charge--“arme che cantano”--of
the Italians; the French “frasier,” or strawberry, leafed, flowered,
fructed proper; the buck too, figured here, comes in or about their
armorial shields. Hence then we are fairly warranted in thinking that
it was a Fraser’s lady hand which wrought this small, but elaborate
cushion, most likely as a gift, and with a strong meaning about it,
to our King James I., whose unicorn is not forgotten here; and, in
all probability, whilst she also wished to indicate that an S was the
first letter in her own baptismal name. Siren too is another term for
mermaid--that emblem so conspicuously figured by the lady’s side. All
this, with the love-knot so plentifully broadcast and interwoven after
many ways, and sprinkled everywhere as such a favourite device, perhaps
may help some future biographer of James to throw a light over a few
hidden passages in the life of that sovereign.
Human hair, or something very like it, was put into the embroidery on
parts of this small cushion. On the under side, to the left, stands a
lady with her hair lying in rolls about her forehead. After looking
well into them, through a glass, these rolls seem to be real human
hair--may be the lady’s own--it is yellow. Peering narrowly into those
red roses close by, seeded and barbed, the seeded part or middle is
found to be worked with two distinct sorts of human hair--one the very
same as the golden hair on the lady’s brow, the other of a light sandy
shade: could this have been king James’s? His son, Charles I., used,
as it would seem, to send from his prison locks of his own hair to some
few of the gentry favourable to his cause, so that the ladies of that
house, while working his royal portraiture in coloured silks, might
be able to do the head of hair on it, in the very hair itself of that
sovereign. One or two of such wrought likenesses of king Charles were,
not long ago, shown in the exhibition of miniatures which took place in
this Museum.
For verifying passages in early as well as mediæval times, little does
the historian think of finding in these specimens such a help for the
purpose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account