Textile Fabrics: A Descriptive Catalogue of the Collection of Church-vestments, Dresses, Silk Stuffs, Needlework and Tapestries, forming that Section of the MuseumRock, Daniel
History
Textile Fabrics: A Descriptive Catalogue of the Collection of Church-vestments, Dresses, Silk Stuffs, Needlework and Tapestries, forming that Section of the Museum
Rock, Daniel
Art objects -- England -- London -- Catalogs; Textile fabrics
Ralph, dean of St. Paul’s cathedral, London, tells us, that William
de Magna Villa, on coming home from his pilgrimage to the Holy Land,
made presents to several churches, A.D. 1178, of cloths which at
Constantinople were called imperial: “Pannos quos Constantinopolis
civitas vocat Imperiales, &c.”[191] Relating the story of John’s
apparition, A.D. 1226, Roger Wendover, and after him Matt. Paris,
tells us that the King stood forth dressed in royal robes made of
the stuff they call Imperial: “Astitit rex in vestibus regalibus de
panno scilicet quem imperialem appellant.”[192] In the Inventory of
St. Paul’s, London, drawn up A.D. 1295, four tunicles, vestments for
subdeacons and lower ministers about the altar, are mentioned as made
of this imperial. No colour is specified, except in the one instance
of the silk being marbled; and the patterns are noticed as of red and
green, with lions wove in gold.[193] It seems not to have been thought
good enough for the more important vestments, such as chasubles and
copes. Were it not spoken of thus by Wendover and Paris, as well as by
a dean of St. Paul’s, and mentioned once as used in a few liturgical
garments for that cathedral, we had never heard a word about such
a textile anywhere in England. Our belief is that it got its name
neither from its colour--supposed royal purple--nor its costliness,
but through quite another reason: woven at a workshop kept up by the
Byzantine emperors, just like the Gobelins is to-day in Paris by the
French, and bearing about it some small, though noticeable mark, it
took the designation of “Imperial.” That it was partly wrought with
gold, we know; but that its tint was always some shade of the imperial
purple--hence its appellation--is a purely gratuitous assumption.
Moreover, as Saracenic princes in general had wrought in their own
palaces, at the tiraz there, those silks wanted by themselves, their
friends, and officers, and caused them to be marked with some adopted
word or sentence; so, too, the rulers of Byzantium followed, it is
likely the same usage, and put some royal device or word, or name in
Greek upon theirs, and hence such textiles took the name of Imperial.
In France, this textile was in use as late as the second half of the
fifteenth century, but looked upon as old. Here, at York, as late as
the early part of the sixteenth, one of its deans bestowed on that
cathedral “two (blue) copes of clothe imperialle.”[194]
[184] Ed. Oliver, p. 298.
[185] Ib. p. 312.
[186] Plate v. p. 53.
[187] Plate xii. p. 141.
[188] Dugdale’s St. Paul’s, p. 318.
[189] Ib.
[190] York Fabric Rolls, p. 230.
[191] Hist. Anglic. Script. X. t. i. p. 602, ed. Twysden.
[192] Rog. de Wendover, Chronica, t. iv. p. 127, ed. Coxe.
[193] P. 322.
[194] Fabric Rolls, p. 310.
BAUDEKIN
Was a costly stuff much employed and often spoken of in our literature
during many years of the mediæval period.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account