Eurasians -- Fiction; India -- History -- British occupation, 1765-1947 -- Fiction
My application was denied, on the plea that the Revenue Department could
not upset a report of the Settlement Officer who had been upon the
ground and thoroughly understood the whole matter.
I went to the Collector and laid the whole subject before him, asking
for justice, omitting all mention of anything unpleasant that had
occurred. He wrote to the Department stating that he had spent some days
at these villages; that they were models, not only of the district but
of all India; that he had never seen any to compare with them; that they
were like villages at home; that he was surprised and delighted to find
that such improvements could be made in India; but it was all due to the
energy and personal attention of Mr. Japhet, who had spent large amounts
of money in the improvements. He hoped, therefore, that the Board would
reconsider its decision, as it would only be just to Mr. Japhet to make
some concession. The reply was that in view of the representations of
the Collector the assessment would be reduced to ten per cent. above the
former rate, but “further than that it would not be advisable, etc.”
This was a gain, and somewhat satisfactory. If a robber waylays you, and
empties your pockets, it is better to accept a sovereign that he
generously offers you out of your own purse, than go without supper and
bed.
I had then the pleasure of re-stocking my tank with fish and in the
evening after it was finished, at our assembly, we had a kind of a
jubilee meeting, thanking our stars that another settlement officer
would not come again for thirty-three years.
CHAPTER XXXV.
This arbitrary assessment of lands without regard to the expense of the
improvements, is one of the greatest drawbacks to the prosperity of
India where there is not a permanent settlement. I have been told by
many zemindars that any improvement of their villages would only be to
their detriment, that the digging of wells and tanks, the planting of
trees and the enrichment of the soil, would only increase their
assessment. I have known of villages where lands were allowed to remain
idle, and become barren several years before the settlement, so that
they might be assessed as waste land. As soon as the settlement was made
these lands were again cultivated. The Government forces the people to
become deceivers. My experience showed me that the zemindars were
correct in their statements. That if one did not wish to be punished for
making improvements he should do nothing. It is a pitiable condition in
which to place the people by a civilized government that is continually
appointing commissions to formulate voluminous reports and getting the
opinion of scientific book farmers on the improvement of the
agricultural condition of India. What is the inducement for any one to
plant a tree, dig a well or tank, or improve the soil, when he knows as
sure as the sun rises, that the Government will fine him for all he
does?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account