Eurasians -- Fiction; India -- History -- British occupation, 1765-1947 -- Fiction
On our return home my wife and sister seemed to have enjoyed their
company. The one certainly never suspected that her consort was my
father, her father-in-law. Though now aged, he was an accomplished man
of society. I say it, though he was my villain of a father, he could
pose anywhere with the outward grace of a gentleman. Outwardly in
“society” he observed the decencies of life, but his hypocrisy was a
sufficient cloak to conceal his immoralities. The other did not realize
that her escort was her half brother and mine as well. Why tell them?
This question often came to me during years afterward. Why did I allow
them to go out with these men? I cannot tell. We are not always able to
give a reason why we do thus and so. Another question. What would these
ladies have said and done had they known who their gentlemen were? I can
surmise about my wife. Had she learned at table who he was, my venerable
parent would have thought himself in a hurricane storm off the Irish
coast, as she would have given him such cutting strokes of her native
wit that he would have preferred a dish of bitter herbs to the elaborate
spread before him, so her ignorance was bliss to him.
It appeared that my sister in her agitation at seeing Smith Sr. did not
catch the name of the other man when she was introduced, so after our
return home she asked his name. I quickly replied Smythe, Smithers, or
some other name commencing with S. She asked no further and I was
content. Now comes a question in morals, whether it is ever right to
deceive. One of the maxims of the Roman church is that “it is an act of
virtue to deceive and lie when the church might be promoted.” If the
church can do this by a pious fraud, why not an individual mislead
another for his good? But I will not discuss the subject. Had she
suddenly become aware that she was seated by her half brother, the son
of her father, she would have fainted or rushed away in fright and
disgust.
It is well we do not know everything about others, nor in fact all about
ourselves. Any one will loathe his own skin when seen through a
microscope. A traveler once dined well and heartily, praising the roast,
but on being informed that it was monkey, was suddenly afflicted with a
mal de mer, and was ill for a week afterward. To make him turn pale it
was only to say “monkey.”
But how did the gentlemen feel? I don’t know. The one I think was so
blasé in sin that he would have bluffed either an angel of light or the
devil himself, and without a blush. I have often imagined a little
scene, a catastrophe that I might have made by some introductions, as
“Mr. Smith, my father, your daughter-in-law, my wife,” or “Mr. Smith,
your daughter, my sister,” or “Mr. Smith, my brother, this is your
sister.” I am glad now that I was not fool or rogue enough to have done
it. Yet there would have been lots of fun to me in the doing of it, and
lots of misery to two of them at least. We get pain and trouble enough
without trying to make it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account