Eurasians -- Fiction; India -- History -- British occupation, 1765-1947 -- Fiction
To become an officer in the army the same difficulties arose. I could
not become a soldier as I learned that Eurasians were not accepted. In
fact I had no liking whatever for the army, even had there been an
opening for me. I always had a repugnance to taking life. I could not
see a chicken killed without a sense of pain and to see a gasping fish
just taken from the water gave me a shock. In my life I have gone out
shooting and the more birds I killed, the greater the burden of sorrow I
carried home, thinking of the number of lives I had destroyed when God
had created them as well as me and that they had as much right as I to
live. I never could realize any pleasure in what is called sport when
life is involved. For a number of men, not to mention women, to chase a
fox until he is worried to death and then let him be torn to pieces by
hounds was always a cruel, fiendish business to me. Suppose some bigger
brutes than these ladies and gentlemen, as they style themselves, should
run them down with horses and hounds as in former times slaves were
hunted, and tear them to pieces, what would they think of the sport?
Anent this subject one of the best English novelists makes one of his
characters say: “The most blood-thirsty nation on the earth, you shed
blood for mere amusement; we only shed it for some deep purpose, such as
revenge, ambition and the like. You English are not happy unless you are
killing something, if it is only a pigeon out of a trap; there is too
much of the Saxon and the Dane about you. Again your chief outdoor
amusement consists of galloping on horseback with a number of dogs, over
hedges and ditches after a poor animal called a fox, and when you see
the wretched, fagged-out creature torn to pieces by your dogs, you ride
home satisfied to your dinner.”
It is bad enough to kill birds and beasts for our food, but to kill men,
who, we are taught, have immortal souls, was and always has been,
horrible to me. Adam Smith, in his “Wealth of Nations,” says, “The trade
of a butcher is a brutal one and an odious business.” If that can be
said of a business which supplies necessary food for the people, what
can be said of a trade for the destruction of human beings, to gratify
the vanity or rapacity of a tyrant or people? To kill his fellowmen is
the soldier’s business, for that he is trained, for that the church
prays for him. The more men killed the greater the glory and the number
of medals. Beautiful trophies for the judgment day—the souls of murdered
men! The uncivilized, unchristian tribes show their valor by the number
of human scalps hanging to their belts, and a “heap big Injun” is the
one who has the greatest number of these tokens of death. Christian “big
Injuns” use honors and medals instead of scalps.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account