Eurasians -- Fiction; India -- History -- British occupation, 1765-1947 -- Fiction
“We took this country because we had the power to do it. We hold it by
might and force, and rule it with a sort of tyranny, a military
despotism. We are not here because the people want us. If we did not
keep the country by force, not by moral or religious power, but by real
brutal force, it would slip out of our hands in a single day. Blink at
it as we may, this is the fact and no one can question it. Here then is
a force, of one hundred and fifty thousand English soldiers, more or
less, sent out at an enormous expense to live by the sweat and blood of
these poverty-stricken, overtaxed natives. Only ten per cent. of these
soldiers are allowed to marry. A direct violation of the laws of God and
nature. It is not enough that the people are taxed to support this great
army, they must also provide victims to gratify the,—I will not say
brutal, for that would be a libel on even the lowest of the brute
creation,—but the foul, inhuman lust of these officers and soldiers. And
what is enough to make infidels of all mankind, is that all this is done
under a Christian Queen, a woman and a mother, by authority of a
Christian Parliament, and executed by the Christian Government of India!
By a nation ever ready to parade its civilization, chivalry and
Christianity! No wonder that these heathen have so little faith in the
Christian religion. I heard an old missionary say that the worst place
for missionary work was in the vicinity of a cantonment; that the very
lowest heathen were degraded by contact with the soldiers. It is so
everywhere.
“A writer on Africa says, ‘The farther the traveler advances into the
interior, the better is the condition of the natives found to be, less
drunkenness and immorality!’ Yet it is pretended that we are holding
this country for the glory of God, and the welfare of the people, and
that the subjugation of the people of the world by Christian nations is
for the promotion of civilization and Christianity! Out on such cant and
hypocrisy! The biggest robbers get the loot, and we are the robbers. Why
not say so, that we are after the loot and nothing else? Why not be
truthful even if we are thieves and not try to cover up our iniquities
with a film of religious varnish?”
I had no chance to put in a word and did not care to, as I thought he
was hitting the bull’s-eye at every shot, but I interjected: “They say
that it is necessary to make some provision.”
“All rot,” he exclaimed, “it is a slander on humanity. Don’t you know
that men can frame excuses and apologies for everything they wish to do?
“Why not make provision for men to commit theft, or highway robbery or
murder? It is false that men cannot restrain or subdue their sexual
passion the same as they subdue their other passions. Are they worse
than the brutes? If men are such gross animals that they cannot control
themselves, they ought to do as Origen, the saint, did to himself, or as
they cripple their fighting stallions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account