It is clear that, for the sake of unity and simplicity, it is
desirable, if possible, to regard the helium nucleus as consisting of
hydrogen nuclei and electrons. If we do not do so, we shall have to
admit the helium nucleus as a third ultimate constituent of matter,
having, by a strange coincidence, just twice the electric charge and
four times the amount of matter that exists in the hydrogen nucleus. It
must be admitted that this is a possible hypothesis; there are no known
facts that prove it to be false. But until we are forced to adopt it,
we shall prefer the simpler view that the helium nucleus is complex,
like every other except hydrogen, and that its relations of mass and
charge to the hydrogen atom are not a lucky fluke. Everything known
about nuclei is consistent with the hypothesis that they are composed
of hydrogen nuclei and electrons. The evidence that they consist of
hydrogen nuclei, electrons, and helium nuclei is overwhelming; the
further step, which dissolves the helium nucleus, is more or less
[Pg 132]
hypothetical, but it is a step which we may take with a reasonable
assurance that it will prove justified. The study of nuclei is still in
its infancy, but is likely to make rapid advances in the near future.
Meanwhile, we may assume, though not with complete certainty, that all
matter consists of hydrogen nuclei and electrons, which are therefore
the only “elements” in the strict sense of the word. Whether these two
will ultimately prove to be modifications of some one more fundamental
substance, it is quite impossible to say. For the present, they
represent the frontier of scientific knowledge, and what lies beyond is
as yet mere speculation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account