Taste enjoyed in the mouth is good, and a good part of the pleasure of
living comes from taste gratification, but taste that returns from the
stomach and is belched by eructation or is lingeringly reminiscent in
the mouth or nose is indicative of indigestion.
Hence it is better to dissipate taste in the mouth, which is the sole
region of taste. Spirits tasted into absorption in this way leave
no odour upon the breath, and asparagus munched and tasted to the
limit in the mouth, carries no odour to the urine. Even the stale and
disagreeable odour of onion or garlic can be neutralised by saliva and
killed in the mouth.
It is extremely difficult to get observers to practise tasting taste
out of liquids as the wine tasters do, and as the tea tasters _have to
do or die_; or, at least, become useless in their profession. Once the
efficacy of the liquid-tasting precaution in digestion is understood,
however, to swallow anything but pure water without tasting it into
absorption produces a shock. This care becomes instinctive quite
easily and regulates itself automatically. It is also a distinct gain
to the gustatory possibilities, which are very limited at best.
When the body will tolerate spirits tasted into it--not poured into
it--at all, which is not often when the nutrition is normal (only in
damp or cold weather, as a general thing, and then in the case of
the writer only at rare intervals, say two or three times a year),
the spirit will mix quickly with the saliva and become neutralised
sufficiently to excite the Swallowing Impulse. Continue sipping the
spirit for a time and you will note that there comes a point where the
saliva and the spirit do not mix, do not neutralise; the mouth becomes
unduly full of liquid without any relaxation or invitation of the
Swallowing Impulse; and the really instinctive inclination will be to
_spit it out_. It is a clear indication that the body-_toleration_ has
been fully taxed; there is no longer any bodily need for alcohol--in
fact, there is no longer natural toleration--and the secretion sent
down into the mouth is evidently mucous for a washing-out process, and
is not alkaline saliva for assisting in a utilisation function.
It is quite uncanny to observe the nicety of mouth-discrimination and
the consistency of it as related to similar substances under similar
conditions, if one learn to read it with precision and intelligence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account