This photograph, taken by a passenger in a Grahame-White biplane, gives
an excellent idea of the view that may be obtained from a machine in
flight. Another aeroplane is flying past the enclosures, and there is a
Midland railway train in the distance.]
As soon as they became reliable, and could be used in war, aeroplanes
and airships were pressed into service as scouts--their task being to
ascend, spy out the land below, and return with news to their
starting-points. That was the first conception of their use, and War
Departments looked no farther. But when machines were built in numbers,
and air fleets began to form, strategists saw the complications that
would ensue. If A has a fleet of aircraft and B also, and A and B are at
war, then the aim of each will be to hamper the other’s air-scouts, and
destroy them whenever possible. Here, again, is the theory of move and
counter-move. The air-scout, flying above an army, may see its secret at
a glance; therefore steps must be taken to keep him off, to drive him
away, to blow him to pieces and all of his kind.
This may be done with a cannon from the ground, but the method is not
certain. Special guns have been built which will point into the air, can
be sighted quickly, and will fire a shell to a great height. If an
aircraft comes within range of them, and the gunner has time to aim
correctly, a bursting shell may bring the machine to ground. But there
are the “ifs” to be remembered. The scout--favoured by a clear day and
using his own judgment--may be able to do his spying without venturing
within range of a land gun; and, even should he come into firing
distance, he may be shot at and missed. Such guns are valuable, of
course--mounted upon motor-cars for speedy transport from place to
place, and used also to guard fortifications, and against aerial foes by
a ship at sea.
Other guns are possible, besides those which fire shells. Attention has
been directed to the feasibility of using a form of vortex-gun. This is
a weapon rather like a huge air-gun. It compresses a charge of air and
discharges it at a high velocity in a whirling vortex or ring. This,
invisible but immensely destructive, strikes its target like a cyclone,
and has been known--even with the use of an experimental gun--to tear up
fences at a distance of several hundred yards. If such a gun was
discharged at an aircraft, and the aim was accurate, it is argued that
the machine would be hurled over and wrecked by the force of the
artificial hurricane.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account