As a matter of fact, tests which have been made up to the present time
are in favour, not of the gunner, but of the aeroplane. This fact is,
however, frequently ignored by the artillery experts. They adhere to
their view, and the airmen to theirs. "Aeroplanes will be swept away
when they come into the danger zone," declare the champions of
artillery. "Nothing of the sort will happen," retort the advocates of
the aeroplane.
It is probable that an unbiased reader will prefer to take a view rather
midway between these two, and be willing to grant that, while some
aeroplanes are likely to be "winged" by skilful gunners, the greater
proportion of them will, on account of their height and speed, escape
being hit.
Since the aeroplane has demonstrated its unquestionable value as a
reconnoitring craft, special guns have been made in order to combat it.
These have long range, and are designed to fire vertically into the air.
Many tests have, also, been made with kites and balloons, to reveal the
ease, or otherwise, of striking an aeroplane in flight.
As regards these experiments, the opinion among experts is again
divided. Artillerymen do not hesitate to say that they prove their
case—which is, of course, that the aeroplane is a vulnerable target.
Aeroplane enthusiasts combat such suggestions; and so the controversy
goes on.
One fact stands suggestively revealed; wise countries, despite
assertions that artillery will blow aeroplanes to pieces, are buying
more and more machines, instead of curtailing their orders.
France and Germany, for instance, which have carried out more tests than
any other countries in regard to the vulnerability of aircraft, are
determined to increase their fleets of aeroplanes.
This, surely, should tell its own story. It is unusually impressive, as
a matter of fact, seeing that artillery experts, both in France and
Germany, have been ready to declare that well-directed gun-fire will rob
aeroplane scouting of its significance. But those who control
constructive policy, both in France and Germany, have judged
impartially; and, as a result, they have bought more aeroplanes.
The difficulty, in carrying out tests of gun-fire, as directed against
aeroplanes, is to obtain artificial conditions which shall, even
roughly, approximate to those which would prevail in actual war. So far,
it has been clear that, in all tests which have been carried out,
conditions have been in favour of the gunner. But, even so, the results
obtained have been inconclusive—to say the least of it.
Let us take, for purpose of illustration, one of the experiments
conducted in France. In this a large box-kite was employed. It was
allowed to ascend, in a strong wind, until it flew at a height, in
regard to its size, which represented, approximately, the target which
would be represented by a scouting aeroplane.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account