That it is, obviously, a machine of a particular type, or make, will not
help the artilleryman, because aeroplanes of all forms of construction
will be employed, in connection with the various armies. The fact that
it may be flying over from behind him, as though it had risen from his
own lines, will prove nothing, as a hostile scout might have made a wide
detour, and so approached the enemy from the rear.
This difficulty as to identifying friend or foe is likely to prove a
real one in time of war, particularly when a large number of machines
are in the air; and, exactly how it will be met, is not easy to see.
Having reviewed the position, so far as the aeroplane and gun-fire are
concerned, it is possible to form more or less definite conclusions
concerning the subject. In the first place, one point is clear: extreme
views are unwise in regard to such a problem as this. What tests so far
carried out have proved, if they have proved anything, is that there are
two points of view.
Artillery experts, who declare that every reconnoitring aeroplane will
be blown to pieces before it can carry out its work, are obviously
wrong; so, too, is the enthusiast who affirms that guns will be
altogether useless when directed against airmen.
What it is possible to deduce, from the generally-inconclusive
experiments recorded, is that the balance of testimony—so far as it can
be estimated—is in favour of the aeroplane. As a matter of fact, the
reasonable view to take is that, when a squadron of aeroplanes
deliberately sets forth to reconnoitre an enemy’s position, a certain
percentage of machines will be hit by gun-fire, and brought to the
ground.
Exactly what that percentage will be is a moot point; experience alone
can tell. But the tests already described suggest, very plainly, that
the percentage should be low.
The skill of the pilot in avoiding fire will be an important factor in
the question—as already mentioned. An over-daring airman may quickly
find himself in danger; a careful, cautious man may do all the work
required of him without giving hostile artillery a chance to get in a
shot.
Level-headed officers, who have practical experience in military flying,
do not anticipate, for a moment, that the aeroplanes which ascend in
time of war will escape scot-free.
"Casualties there are bound to be." The words are those of an expert of
international repute. "Risks will be taken knowingly, according to the
value of the information which is required. War is not a kid-glove
affair. Large squadrons of aeroplanes will be used; and, apart
altogether from the question of the loss of life, the destruction of a
small proportion of machines will not affect the utility of a corps. The
position, in a nutshell, is this: the news that an aeroplane can obtain
is so vitally important that the risk of men, and machines, will be
considered amply justified."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account