The battle in the Channel was fought for nine days. There was no
general strategy or tactics; the English simply sought to isolate and
sink a ship wherever they could. Their heavier cannon were used
against the enemy, and fire-ships were sent among his vessels. When
six Spanish ships had foundered in the Channel, the fleet turned
northward to the coasts of Holland. During their flight an uncertain
number were destroyed by the English, and a few more fell a prey to the
Sea Beggars of Holland. The rest, much battered, turned north to sail
around Scotland. In the storms nineteen ships were wrecked on the
coasts of Scotland and Ireland; of thirty-five ships the Spaniards
themselves {343} could give no account. For two months Philip was in
suspense as to the fate of his great Armada, of which at last only a
riddled and battered remnant returned to home harbors.
The importance of the victory over the Armada, like that of most
dramatic events, has been overestimated. To contemporaries, at least
to the victors and their friends it appeared as the direct judgment of
God: "Flavit Deus et dissipati sunt." The gorgeous rhetoric of Ranke
and Froude has painted it as one of the turning points in world
history. But in reality it rather marked than made an epoch. Had
Philip's ships won, it is still inconceivable that he could have
imposed his dominion on England any more than he could on the
Netherlands. England was ripening and Spain was rotting for half a
century before the collision made this fact plain to all. The Armada
did not end the war nor did it give the death blow to Spanish power,
much less to Catholicism. On the Continent of Europe things went on
almost unchanged.
But in England the effect was considerable. The victory stimulated
national pride; it strengthened the Protestants, and the left wing of
that party. Though the Catholics had shown themselves loyal during the
crisis they were subjected, immediately thereafter, to the severest
persecution they had yet felt. This was due partly to nervous
excitement of the whole population, partly to the advance towards power
of the Puritans, always the war party.
[Sidenote: Puritans]
Even in the first years of the great queen there had been a number of
Calvinists who looked askance at the Anglican settlement as too much of
a compromise with Catholicism and Lutheranism. The Thirty-nine
Articles passed Convocation by a single vote [Sidenote: 1563] as
against a more Calvinistic confession. Low-churchmen (as they would
now be called) attacked the "Aaronic" {344} vestments of the Anglican
priests, and prelacy was detested as but one degree removed from papacy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account