"SIR,--A letter entitled 'On the Trail of a Ghost,' which you
publish to-day, appears to suggest throughout that some statement
has been made on behalf of the Society for Psychical Research with
regard to the house which your correspondent visited. This,
however, is not the case; and as a misleading impression may be
created, I must ask you to allow me space to state that I visited
B----, representing that society, before your correspondent's
visit, and decided that there was no such evidence as could
justify us in giving the results of the inquiry a place in our
_Proceedings_. I had already communicated this judgment to Lord
Bute, to the council of the society, and to Professor Sidgwick,
the editor of our _Proceedings_, and it had been agreed to act
upon it.--I am, Sir, your obedient servant,
"FREDERICK W.H. MYERS,
_Hon. Sec. of the Society for Psychical Research._
"LECKHAMPTON HOUSE, CAMBRIDGE, _June 8_."
One may gather from a comparison of this letter with the foregoing
records that the standard of evidence is a somewhat variable quantity
in the Society for Psychical Research. In attempting to explain the
matter, Mr. Myers wrote to Lord Bute, June 11, 1897:--
"As to haunted houses recorded at length in _Proceedings_, there have
been several minor ones, and one especially, 'Records of a Haunted
House,' where I was instrumental in getting the account written. The
great point there was the amount of coincidence of visions seen
independently.... In the B---- case there is _some_ coincidence of
vision, but so far as I know, not nearly so much as in the Records of
a Haunted House, which did appear in _Proceedings_. We want to keep
our level approximately the same throughout."
Another point of view in relation to the same matter, is that taken by
Miss Freer in an article in the _Nineteenth Century_, August 1897:--
"That the S.P.R. recognised that haunted houses were among the alleged
facts of general interest, was proved by their early appointment of a
Committee of Inquiry, on the management of which it is too late to
reflect. At the end of a few months only, they practically dismissed a
subject which, if considered at all, required years of patient
research. They had come across the surprising number of twenty-eight
cases which they considered worth inquiry; but these were presented to
the public on the evidence of only forty witnesses--that is to say, an
average of less than one and a half to each! The appearance of figures
is recorded in twenty-four of these stories, whilst four record noises
only. Ten years later the _Proceedings_ take up the subject again, and
give us at some length an elaborate story on the evidence of two or
three ladies, two servants, a charwoman, and a little boy. ['Records
of a Haunted House.'] No proper journal was kept, and the Society for
Psychical Research came upon the scene when all was practically over."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account