Arrived at that period, there is much to be said—the mismanagement of
affairs grows apace. First, there is his religion, which he makes a
definite eyesore; second, he is accused of selling honours, dignities,
and power, both with his own hands and by those of his favourites; third,
he appoints Senators without any reference to either their age, good
sense, or nobility; fourth, he sells the offices of praefect, tribune,
ambassador, and general, even those about the palace itself.
Now, all this may be perfectly true. Antonine must have wanted money,
but, as we have remarked before, he had a passion for giving, not for
receiving. The most likely supposition is therefore, that he gave offices
indiscriminately to those who pleased him, and that his favourites, often
debased and unworthy people, sold what they could get hold of to the
highest bidder. The accusation is vitiated by the fact that no names are
mentioned, no instances given, except those of the two chariot drivers,
Protogenes and Gordius, intimates of the Emperor and supervisors of his
sports. It is quite possible that he admired and liked these men for
their proficiency in sport, and that unwholesome minds saw more in the
friendship than was warranted. Of Protogenes we hear no more. Cordus or
Gordius—probably the same person as the above—was made Praefect of the
Watch during the next year; perhaps he was useful, perhaps he was not;
any way he was dismissed in the autumn of 221.
Amongst the last events of this 220th year of our salvation, or early in
the year 221, occurred the divorce of the august Julia Cornelia Paula,
Empress. We know that it was late in the year, as there are coins in
existence struck at Alexandria after 29th August which bear her name, and
others struck at Tripolis in Phoenicia after October 220 (Eckhel). In
all probability this lady was in no way averse to retiring into opulent
privacy, a woman with both a past and a future.
Certainly her husband had neglected her scandalously if even a tithe of
Lampridius’ stories of his infidelities are true, and, from what we can
learn of his psychological state, a certain number are obviously so.
Modern investigation of such psychopathic conditions inclines us to admit
that the boy was a sort of nymphomaniac, if not entirely homosexual, at
least heterosexual, with a strong homosexual instinct, and it would be
unnatural for any woman to appreciate this temperament in a husband,
especially when she knew, as she must have known, since he was perfectly
frank about it, that he was already allied, by a species of matrimony,
with the chariot driver Hierocles—calling himself wife and Empress—and
that he was not attached to this man alone but to many others, for whom
inquisition had been made throughout the Empire, on account of their
looks and ability to satiate his mania more satisfactorily.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account