It is difficult to ascertain the exact date of the adoption. Herodian’s
statement of the year 220 is easily refuted, both by epigraphic and
numismatic evidence. These give, as near as possible, 10th July in the
year 221, by means of the following deductions:—(1st) The fasti of a
priestly college, probably the Sodales Antoniniani, dated either 2nd or
10th July in that year, describe Alexianus as “Marcus Aurelius Alexander
Nobilissimus Caesar,” and either Imperii _consors_ or _heres_, on which
discrepancy of words hangs a future tale; (2nd) the earliest Alexandrian
coins which call Alexianus Caesar are dated LΕ, or subsequent to 29th
August 221; (3rd) there is an inscription found amongst those of the 7th
Cohort of the Vigiles, which was set up on 1st June of that year, and
commemorates the Imperatores Antoninus et Alexander. The earliest date is
therefore 1st June, the latest the end of July or beginning of August.
The probabilities lie between the two, as the early police inscription
has been accounted for on the grounds that, along with her money, Mamaea
had circulated a report of the adoption before it took place. The
numismatic evidence points to a middle date, because, as far as we can
judge, the Alexandrian mint was most expedite in issuing its coins, and
here, if the adoption took place early in June, they would seem to have
allowed a month or so to elapse between the time they got the news and
the first issue of the coins. Other mints also issued their first coins,
calling Alexander Caesar, towards the end of 221.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account