When you have realised all this, it is surely very easy to see how the
Toltec myth, which has proved the undoing of so many earnest students,
arose. The Aztecs came "out of the north." There is at least no doubt of
that. More, there is every reason to believe that they came from the
north-west, the very quarter so fanatically urged as the direction
whence came the Toltecs. It is doubtful whether they could speak the
language of the race they ousted; in fact it is by no means a bold
assumption to declare they could not. With them they undoubtedly brought
many traditions. When you grasp all this, and realise the further fact
that Tula, the much-talked-of Toltec city, that place which is, it is
suggested, identifiable with the present-day town forty miles north of
Mexico City, became the first Aztec capital in their new land, and
remained so till, under Moctezuma's leadership, they advanced and
founded Tenochtitlan, the present city of Mexico, the blindest and most
obtuse can surely see what the truth is. The whole Toltec imbroglio is
the result of a confusion between the histories of two peoples. The
Aztecs came from the north: the Mayans were architects. Though they were
first and foremost fighters, the conquerors appear to have taken very
kindly to their conquered neighbours' civilisation. Becoming in their
turn architects, nothing would be more natural than that the arrogant
Aztecs should have at last arrived at such an identification of
themselves with the Mayans that the traditions and histories of the two
races became once and for all inextricably mingled till they formed such
an indivisible tangle as to defy the efforts of chroniclers to
unravel.[10]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account