But who were these Mayans, and where did they obtain their knowledge of
building? No race can develop the art of building in stone without
leaving well-marked traces of its slow growth. First, there is the rough
stone building, which would be traceable in heaps of crumbling
rough-hewn stones where they had fallen. Next, would come that stage
when they would learn to mortar the stones together, perhaps adding rude
ornamentation on the exterior walls. Very slowly the roughness would
give place to better-hewn stones; patterns in the ornamentation would be
evolved; and finally you would get the same ornamentation all over the
country, identical as is the decoration of such cities as Kabah,
Chichen, and Uxmal. But there is no crude work in Yucatan. The
unornamented buildings, such as the Akad-Tzib at Chichen, are obviously
of the same date as the ornamented structures. They have the same form,
the same finish of stone; and everything points to the fact that the
plainness of buildings was deliberate and in some way in keeping with
the purpose of the edifice.
We have searched for the early stages of the Mayan building civilisation
in the caves of Yucatan, where traces, if anywhere, of the embryonic
efforts of the architects might be expected, but we searched in vain. Of
those caves that have been inhabited there are but few that have any
signs of building inside, and none with any traces of carvings. A
typical cave of those which had been built in we found in Cozumel
island; but it was almost certain that it had not been used as a
habitation for any long period. Its front, which had stood exposed to
weather and the intrusion of wild beasts, had been built up, with a
doorway in the centre. Its floor of earth was found some four feet
beneath the débris that had blown in and collected since its ancient
occupiers had deserted it; and just under this level was found a small
jar of beads and scattered around were potsherds in a layer of charcoal
where the cave-dweller had done his cooking. It is the opinion of Mr.
Henry C. Mercer (_Hill-Caves of Yucatan_: Philadelphia, 1896), who in
1896 examined most of the caves of the Southern Sierras, that they were
not dwellings but mere halting-places of a wandering people. He could
find in them no trace of an evolution of stone-building. Of those that
had any kind of carving, he says "they are random, sketchy figures, many
of which suggested pictographs of North American Indians. With a few
exceptions there was little of the mannerism of Yucatan about them; and
if they had been inscribed on a cliff-side on the Sasquehana or in Ohio,
few of them would have seemed out of place."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account