The history of Chichen Itza before the arrival of the Spaniards is as
vague and as untrustworthy as all else concerning the ancient Mayans. In
a later chapter we shall review the evidence available as to the date of
its building. M. Desiré Charnay labours needlessly to prove that the
city was inhabited at the time of the Conquest. Of that, at least, there
is no doubt. Even if no credence could be given to the report of the
expedition thither of the elder Montejo in 1528, there is a sufficiency
of Spanish documentary evidence to show that the city was not only
inhabited, but the centre of a vast and powerful population in the
twenties of the sixteenth century. But there is no reason to doubt the
truth of Montejo's account of his sojourn there which has been outlined
in Chapter III. He found Chichen the metropolis of the vast tribe of the
Itzas. The Spanish historian Herrera asserts that Montejo had a return
of the population taken with a view to apportioning the Indians among
his soldiers as slaves, and that each Spaniard became master of between
two and three thousand. Montejo's troops possibly numbered on his
arrival at Chichen some 350, and this would make the census of Indians
work out at something like a million. This is obviously a gross
exaggeration, for even if there was any evidence that Montejo succeeded
so completely in subjugating the Itzas as to be able to enslave them, we
are quite certain from a careful personal survey of the district, that
the country around never could have supported, any more than it could
to-day support, so many inhabitants.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account