The American Electro Magnetic Telegraph: With the Reports of Congress, and a Description of All Telegraphs Known, Employing Electricity or GalvanismVail, Alfred
History
The American Electro Magnetic Telegraph: With the Reports of Congress, and a Description of All Telegraphs Known, Employing Electricity or Galvanism
Vail, Alfred
Telegraph -- History
“The real discoverer of the magnetic properties of electric currents
M. Oersted, Professor of Natural Philosophy, and Secretary of the
Royal Society of Copenhagen. In a work which he published in the
German, about the year 1813, on the identity of chemical and electrical
forces, he had thrown out conjectures concerning the relations
subsisting between the electric, galvanic and magnetic fluids, which
he conceived might differ from one another only in their respective
degrees of tension. If galvanism, he argued, be merely a more latent
form of electricity, so magnetism may possibly be nothing more than
electricity in a still more latent form; and he, therefore, proposed it
as a subject worthy of inquiry, whether electricity employed in this,
its most latent form, might not be found to have a sensible effect
upon a magnet. It is difficult clearly to understand what he meant
by the expression of _latent states_, as applied to electricity, but
it may be sufficient for us to know, that in the various endeavours
he subsequently made to verify his conjectures, he was led to such
forms of experiment as afforded decisive indications of the influence
of Voltaic currents on the magnetized needle. Yet, even after he had
succeeded thus far, it was a matter of extreme difficulty to determine
the real direction of this action, and it was not till the close of the
year 1819, that his perseverance was at length rewarded by complete
success.
“The first account of his discovery that appeared in England is
contained in a paper, which he himself communicated, in Thompson’s
Annals of Philosophy, for October, 1820, vol. 16, page 273; and in
which the following experiments are described. The two poles of a
powerful Voltaic battery were connected by a metallic wire, so as to
complete the galvanic circuit. The wire which performs this office
he called the _uniting_ wire; and the effect, whatever it may be,
which takes place in this conductor, and in the space surrounding
it, during the passage of the electricity, he designates by the term
_electric_ conflict, from an idea that there takes place some continued
collision and neutralization of the two species of electric fluids,
while circulating in opposite currents in the apparatus. Then taking a
magnetic needle, properly balanced on its pivot, as in the mariner’s
compass, and allowing it to assume its natural position in the magnetic
meridian, he placed a straight portion of the uniting wire horizontally
above the needle, and in a direction parallel to it; and then completed
the circuit, so that the electric current passed through the wire.
The moment this was done, the needle changed its position, its ends
deviating from the north and south towards the east and west, according
to the direction in which the electric current flowed, so that by
reversing the direction of the current the motion of the needle was
also reversed. The general law he expressed as follows: ‘That end of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account